Earthquake Report: Chile!

The aftershocks from the 2015.09.16 M 8.3 Chile earthquake continue. Today was an earthquake with magnitude M = 6.3. Here is the USGS website for today’s earthquake. I presented a comprehensive review of Chile’s historic seismicity, as well as the seismicity from 2015, here. I also presnt a summary of the seismicity in this region from 2000-2015 here.

Below is my interpretive map for today’s earthquake. I have plotted the epicenters (using the USGS earthquake feed kml) for the past 30 days with magnitudes 2.5 or greater, with color representing depth. I also include the slab depth contours from Hayes et al. (2012). These are the depth contours for the fault interface of the subduction zone. I discuss this further in my Chile 2015 Earthquake Report. The M 6.3 earthquake has a depth of ~31.5 km, which modestly fits the slab contours (the three shallowest contours are labeled in red). I also plot the historic earthquake slip regions in green (Beck et al., 1998). I include the earthquake intensity, using the USGS Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale. The largest MMI intensity contour is VI. I plot the location of the Juan de Fernandez Ridge in yellow, which may be controling the segmentation of faulting along this subduction zone (von Huene et al., 1997).

I placed a moment tensor / focal mechanism legend in the upper right corner of the map. There is more material from the USGS web sites about moment tensors and focal mechanisms (the beach ball symbols). Both moment tensors and focal mechanisms are solutions to seismologic data that reveal two possible interpretations for fault orientation and sense of motion. One must use other information, like the regional tectonics, to interpret which of the two possibilities is more likely.


Here is the map that I include as an inset map. This map shows the extent of the 2010 and 2015 subduction zone earthquakes in Chile.


I also placed a map from the USGS earthquake summary poster in the lower left corner (Hayes et al., 2015). The red rectangle shows the general location of the main map. The USGS plot epicenters for historic earthquakes on the map, along with the slab contours (Hayes et al., 2012). There are two cross sections plotted on the map (C-C’ on the north and D-D’ on the south). The USGS plot these hypocenters along these two cross sections and I include those. The 2015 earthquake patch is just south of cross section C-C’.

    Here is the legend for the hypocentral cross sections.

In the lower right corner I place a cross section from Melnick et al. (2006). This shows the prehistoric earthquake history on the left and a cross section of the subduction zone on the right. This cross section is in the region of the 2010 subduction zone earthquake. Above the Melnick et al. (2006) figure I include the space-time diagram from Beck et al. (1998 ) showing the along strike length of prehistoric earthquakes in the central subduction zone. The map above shows these prehistoric rupture strike lengths as green lines (labeled with green labels). The 2015 earthquake series ruptured past the southern boundary of the 1943 earthquake and about 30% into the 1922 earthquake region. There is a small gap between the 2010 and 2015 earthquake series, which aligns with the Juan Fernandez Ridge (a fracture zone in the Nazca plate; von Huene et al., 1997; Rodrigo et al., 2014). This fracture zone appears to be a structural boundary to earthquake slip patches (subduction zone segmentation), at least for some earthquakes. Beck et al. (1998 ) show that possibly two earthquakes ruptured past this boundary (1730 A.D. and possibly 1647 A.D., though that is queried). This segment boundary appears to be rather persistent for the past ~500 years.

Here is the cross section of the subduction zone just to the south of this Sept/Nov 2015 swarm (Melnick et al., 2006). Below I include the text from the Melnick et al. (2006) figure caption as block text.


(A) Seismotectonic segments, rupture zones of historical subduction earthquakes, and main tectonic features of the south-central Andean convergent margin. Earthquakes were compiled from Lomnitz (1970, 2004), Kelleher (1972), Comte et al. (1986), Cifuentes (1989), Beck et al. (1998 ), and Campos et al. (2002). Nazca plate and trench are from Bangs and Cande (1997) and Tebbens and Cande (1997). Maximum extension of glaciers is from Rabassa and Clapperton (1990). F.Z.—fracture zone. (B) Regional morphotectonic units, Quaternary faults, and location of the study area. Trench and slope have been interpreted from multibeam bathymetry and seismic-reflection profiles (Reichert et al., 2002). (C) Profile of the offshore Chile margin at ~37°S, indicated by thick stippled line on the map and based on seismic-reflection profiles SO161-24 and ENAP-017. Integrated Seismological experiment in the Southern Andes (ISSA) local network seismicity (Bohm et al., 2002) is shown by dots; focal mechanism is from Bruhn (2003). Updip limit of seismogenic coupling zone from heat-fl ow measurements (Grevemeyer et al., 2003). Basal accretion of trench sediments from sandbox models (Lohrmann, 2002; Glodny et al., 2005). Convergence parameters from Somoza (1998 ).

References:

Category(s): College Redwoods, earthquake, education, geology, HSU, pacific, plate tectonics

2 Responses in other blogs/articles

  1. […] In February of this year, there was a M 6.3 earthquake near the coast which caused considerable damage. Below is my interpretive poster for that earthquake and here is my report. […]

  2. […] In February of this year, there was a M 6.3 earthquake near the coast which caused considerable damage. Below is my interpretive poster for that earthquake and here is my report. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.