{"id":9580,"date":"2020-06-27T23:11:52","date_gmt":"2020-06-28T07:11:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=9580"},"modified":"2023-06-25T18:54:55","modified_gmt":"2023-06-25T18:54:55","slug":"earthquake-report-owens-valley-ca","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=9580","title":{"rendered":"Earthquake Report: Owens Valley, CA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Well, the east side of the Sierra lives up to its reputation for being in earthquake country. From the July 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence (<a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8656\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">reports here<\/a>)to some shakers east of Mono Lake, to the May 2020 Monte Cristo Earthquake Sequence (<a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=9503\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">report here<\/a>) to some earthquakes in the Owens Lake area of California. Residents of Olancha, Lone Pine, and Keeler felt strong shaking from a magnitude M 5.8 earthquake, also preceded by about 2 days with a M 4.6 temblor.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/earthquake.usgs.gov\/earthquakes\/eventpage\/ci39493944\/executive\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/earthquake.usgs.gov\/earthquakes\/eventpage\/ci39493944\/executive<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The plate tectonics in the western US is overwhelmingly dominated by the plate boundary between the North America and Pacific plate. The North America plate moves south &#8220;relative&#8221; to the Pacific plate. Standing on the Pacific plate, looking across the fault, the North America plate moves to your right (a right-lateral strike-slip fault).<\/p>\n<p>Here, both plates are moving &#8220;absolutely&#8221; in the northwestern direction, but the Pacific plate is moving slower. Therefore the relative sense of motion results in a right-lateral fault.<\/p>\n<p>The plates move side-by-side at a velocity (speed) of about 50 mm per year (2 inches per year). In California, most of this relative motion is localized along the San Andreas fault system. But there are sub-parallel &#8220;sibling&#8221; faults that also share some of the &#8220;slip budget&#8221; (their proportion of the 50 mm\/yr).<\/p>\n<p>About 20% of the relative plate motion is found along faults on the east side of the Sierra Nevada, along the Eastern California Shear Zone and the Walker Lane system.<\/p>\n<p>Further to the north, in northern California, Oregon, Washington, and Canada, the relative plate motion is compressive, forming the <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=3640\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Cascadia subduction zone<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>East of California, the plate boundary experiences relative extension, forming the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Basin_and_Range_Province\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">geomorphic province called the Basin and Range<\/a>. The faults in the Basin and Range are mostly normal faults (extensional faults).<br \/>\nRead more about <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=8202\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">the different fault types here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>On 26 March 1872 there was a large earthquake that ruptured faults from south of Owens Lake near Olancha, CA northwards to Big Pine, CA. This earthquake may be the largest historic earthquake in California with a magnitude of M 7.8 to 7.9 (Hough and Hutton, 2008).<\/p>\n<p>This earthquake was the result of slip on the Owens Valley fault system (OVF). The majority of slip was right-lateral strike-slip, but because the OVF is not perfectly aligned with the relative plate motion, some of the slip on these faults was normal slip (i.e. extensional).<\/p>\n<p>There are still preserved remains of structures damaged by the earthquake in Lone Pine, CA.<\/p>\n<p>The OVF has been mapped and trenched across to learn about the prehistoric record of earthquakes on the fault.<\/p>\n<p>Also, from measurements of features that have been offset along the fault during earthquakes, along with knowledge of the age of those features, we can estimate how fast the frust is moving relatively across the fault. Below are some figures that help us learn about this historty and activity of the OVF (e.g. Bacon and Pezzopane, 2007; Kirby et al, 2008; Haddon et al., 2013; Bacon et al., 2019).<\/p>\n<p>Beth Haddon et al. (2013) conducted a very interesting study that compiled and updated previous slip estimates for the 1872 OVF earthquake. Their analysis vastly improved the estimate of how much the fault slipped at different locations along the fault (i.e. the fault slip distribution) and included a novel way to account for uncertainty (a.k.a. error) in the measurements of these offsets.<\/p>\n<p>California Geological Survey Engineering Geologist Brian Olson was sent to the field to make observations of fault rupture, landslides, and liquefaction related to this earthquake. Some of his tweets from the field are included below in the social media section.<\/p>\n<h2><font color=\"orange\">Below is my interpretive poster for this earthquake<\/font><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>I plot the seismicity from the past month, with diameter representing magnitude (see legend). I include earthquake epicenters from 1920-2020. <\/li>\n<li>I plot the USGS fault plane solutions (moment tensors in blue and focal mechanisms in orange), possibly in addition to some relevant historic earthquakes. <\/li>\n<li>A review of the basic base map variations and data that I use for the interpretive posters can be found on the <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=3218\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Earthquake Reports page<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Some basic fundamentals of earthquake geology and plate tectonics can be found on the <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=8202\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Earthquake Plate Tectonic Fundamentals page<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<h3><font color=\"orange\">I include some inset figures. Some of the same figures are located in different places on the larger scale map below.<\/font><\/h3>\n<li>In the upper left corner is a map that shows the earthquake faults and historic earthquake locations (epicenters) in the western US. Historic earthquake fault ruptures are mapped as red lines and labeled with their year and magnitude. <\/li>\n<li>In the lower right corner is a map that shows a comparison of the California Geological Survey Shakemap (a model of how strong the ground might shake during the M 5.8 earthquake) and results from online web surveys from peoples&#8217; real observations (i.e. &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/earthquake.usgs.gov\/data\/dyfi\/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Did You Feel It?<\/a>&#8221; reports. The colored lines show the boundary between different levels of intensity using the Modified Mercalli Intensity (NNI) scale. The areas are colored relative to the DYFI reports, using the same MMI scale and colors shown on the legend).<\/li>\n<li>In the lower center is an illustration showing how earthquake intensity is higher closer to the earthquake. With distance, the intensity goes down. This is another comparison between the Shakemap models and the DYFI observations.<\/li>\n<li>In the upper right corner is a map that shows the liquefaction susceptibility, or the chance that an area may experience liquefaction during the earthquake. I present a map that also shows the chance that there will be landslides triggered by the earthquake lower in this report. Also, check out social media section to see videos of evidence of these landslides.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is the map with a year&#8217;s seismicity plotted (and a century in the overview map).<\/li>\n<li>Something to note is that these Owens Lake earthquakes follow some triggered earthquakes that have been going on in the Coso Mountains and to the west of the reservoirs along the Owens River. Following the Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence, the crust near the fault that slipped flexed like our elastic waist bands. This flexing caused the forces acting on faults withing the crust to increase and decrease in different places. These changes are called changes in static coulomb stress.<\/li>\n<li>According to some studies (see tweets and the Temblor reports related to Ridgecrest), the area to the northwest of Ridgecrest have increased static coulomb stress changes, which increases the chance that faults might slip in those areas.<\/li>\n<li>Guess where these Owens Valley earthquakes are happening? Yup, in an area tha has possibly experienced an increase in stress.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/20200624_lone_pine_interpretation.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/20200624_lone_pine_interpretation.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Below is an updated map that shows the aftershocks (and foreshocks) related to the M 5.8 earthquake.<\/li>\n<li>There have only been two earthquakes in the past century that have magnitudes M \u2265 5. Some earthquakes can have aftershocks that last centuries (like the 1872 central Washington earthquake, which is still popping off aftershocks today). Because of the paucity of seismicity in this area, we may not be able to know if these two events in 2009 are aftershocks from 1872. The same is true for the M 5.8 sectence that is ongoing right now in Owens Valley. I suspect that these are unrelated to 1872 and are directly related to the Ridgecrest Earthquakes.<\/li>\n<li>This part of the OVF is at the end of the fault, where it is less organized, so fault lengths are shorter and misaligned. Based on the work of Haddon et al. (2013), the slip on these faults in 1872 was low. So, maybe these faults had more accumulated strain than the rest of the OVF faults, so we would not expect more earthquakes on the OVF system (?). Hard to really know&#8230;<\/li>\n<ul>\n<h3><font color=\"orange\">I include some inset figures. Some of the same figures are located in different places on the larger scale map below.<\/font><\/h3>\n<li>In the upper left corner is a map that shows historic earthquake locations (a century M \u2265 2 and a week M \u2265 0). I highlight areas of recent seismic unrest.<\/li>\n<li>In the upper right corner is a map from Bacon et al. (2019) that shows the different faults that they studied in this area. Each different fault is colored and labeled, along with symbology showing what type of relative motion is accommodated on those faults. These authors mapped and dated prehistoric shorelines, then used their location to evaluate slip rates for these faults over a very long time span.<\/li>\n<li>In the lower right corner are some cross sections showing how Bacon et al\/ (20219) interpret how the tectonic structures are oriented in the subsurface beneath the Owens Valley. The locations for section A-A&#8217; and B-B&#8217; are shown on the main map as yellow-green lines.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/20200624_lone_pine_aftershock_interpretation.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/20200624_lone_pine_aftershock_interpretation.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>So what does all this mean about the future? We won&#8217;t know until the future becomes the present, and then the past.<\/li>\n<li>The Garlock fault south of Ridgecrest. Some of the most detailed paleoseismology studies have taken place along the Garlock fault. Yet, we don&#8217;t know if there will be an earthquake there tomorrow or a decade or century from now. Read <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8850\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">more about the Garlock fault here<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>The Blackwater fault south of Ridgecrest. There are numerous faults in the Eastern California Shear Zone between the Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence and the Landers and Hector Mine earthquakes from 1992 and 1999 respectively. How do changes in stress following the Ridgecrest earthquake affect the crust south of the Garlock fault? This is a place to watch, but it may take decades, or more, before there is an earthquake here.<\/li>\n<li>The Owens Valley fault north of Ridgecrest. This seems like a lesser likelihood. The average time between large earthquakes on the OVF is several thousands of years and 1972 was the last one. It is possible we don&#8217;t know everything about this system (as always, our knowledge about prehistoric earthquakes is a minimum estimate; we may find more evidence later).<\/li>\n<li>The area north of the 1972 OVF earthquake and south of the Cedar Mountain Earthquake or anywhere along the 395 corridor through Walker, Carson City, Reno, etc. The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fop.cascadiageo.org\/?page_id=978\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">2019 Pacific Cell Friends of the Pleistocene<\/a> field trip reviewed some evidences for recent faulting in this region. So, this is a place to watch for sure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<h2><strong><font color=\"orange\">Earthquake Triggered Landslides and Liquefaction<\/font><\/strong><\/h2>\n<li>Here is a suite of maps that use USGS earthquake products to help us learn about how earthquakes may affect the landscape: landslide probability and liquefaction susceptibility (a.k.a. the <a href=\"https:\/\/earthquake.usgs.gov\/data\/ground-failure\/background.php\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Ground Failure data products<\/a>)..<\/li>\n<li>First I present the landslide probability model. This is a GIS data product that relates a variety of factors to the probability (the chance of) landslides as triggered by this earthquake. There are a number of assumptions that are made in order to be able to produce this model across such a large region, though this is still of great value (like other aspects from the USGS, e.g. the PAGER alert). <a href=\"https:\/\/earthquake.usgs.gov\/data\/ground-failure\/background.php\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Learn more about all of these Ground Failure products here<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>There are many different ways in which a landslide can be triggered. The first order relations behind slope failure (landslides) is that the \u201cresisting\u201d forces that are preventing slope failure (e.g. the strength of the bedrock or soil) are overcome by the \u201cdriving\u201d forces that are pushing this land downwards (e.g. gravity). I spend more time discussing landslides and liquefaction in <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8528\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">this recent earthquake report<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>This model, like all landslide computer models, uses similar inputs. I review these here:<\/li>\n<ol>\n<li>Some information about ground shaking. Often, people use Peak Ground Acceleration, though in the past decade+, it has been recognized that the parameter &#8220;Arias Intensity&#8221; is a better measure of the energy imparted by the earthquake across the land and seascape. Instead of simply accounting for the peak accelerations, AI integrates the entire energy (duration) during the earthquake. That being said, PGA is a more common parameter that is available for people to use. For example, when I was modeling slope stability for the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone earthquake, the only model that was calibrated to observational data were in units of PGA. The first order control to shaking intensity (energy observed at any particular location) is distance to the earthquake fault that slipped.<\/li>\n<li>Some information about the strength of the materials (e.g. angle of internal friction (the strength) and cohesion (the resistance).<\/li>\n<li>Information about the slope. Steeper slopes, with all other things being equal, are more likely to fail than are shallower slopes. Think about skiing. Beginners (like me) often choose shallower slopes to ski because they will go down the slope slower, while experts choose steeper slopes.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<li>I use the same color scheme that is presented by the USGS on their website. Note that the majority of areas that may have experienced earthquake triggered landslides are cream in color (0.3-1%). There are a few places with a slightly higher chance that there were triggered landslides. It is possible that there were no significant landslides from this earthquake. The lower bounds for earthquake triggered landslides on land is about M 5.5 and a M 6.4 releases much more energy than that.<\/li>\n<li>Landslide ground shaking can change the Factor of Safety in several ways that might increase the driving force or decrease the resisting force. Keefer (1984) studied a global data set of earthquake triggered landslides and found that larger earthquakes trigger larger and more numerous landslides across a larger area than do smaller earthquakes. Earthquakes can cause landslides because the seismic waves can cause the driving force to increase (the earthquake motions can \u201cpush\u201d the land downwards), leading to a landslide. In addition, ground shaking can change the strength of these earth materials (a form of resisting force) with a process called liquefaction.<\/li>\n<li>Sediment or soil strength is based upon the ability for sediment particles to push against each other without moving. This is a combination of friction and the forces exerted between these particles. This is loosely what we call the \u201cangle of internal friction.\u201d Liquefaction is a process by which pore pressure increases cause water to push out against the sediment particles so that they are no longer touching.<\/li>\n<li>An analogy that some may be familiar with relates to a visit to the beach. When one is walking on the wet sand near the shoreline, the sand may hold the weight of our body generally pretty well. However, if we stop and vibrate our feet back and forth, this causes pore pressure to increase and we sink into the sand as the sand liquefies. Or, at least our feet sink into the sand.<\/li>\n<li>Below is the liquefaction susceptibility map. I discuss liquefaction more in my earthquake report on the 28 September 20018 Sulawesi, Indonesia earthquake, landslide, and tsunami <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=7866\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>I use the same color scheme that the USGS uses on their website. Note how the areas that are more likely to have experienced earthquake induced liquefaction are in the valleys. The fact that this earthquake happened in the summer time suggests that there may not have been any liquefaction from this earthquake.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/20200624_lone_pine_slope_failure_interpretation.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/20200624_lone_pine_slope_failure_interpretation.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><strong><font color=\"orange\">Other Report Pages<\/font><\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><strong><font color=\"orange\">Some Relevant Discussion and Figures<\/font><\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is a figure from Rinke et al. (2012) that shows the global and regional tectonics here. I include the figure captions below as blockquotes. The first map shows the plate boundary scale tectonic regions. This is a generalized map (e.g. don&#8217;t pay attention to where the San Andreas and Cascadia faults are located). <\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20161228_nevada\/rinke_etal_2012_Pliocene_Sinistral_Slip_Adobe_Hills_in_press_fig_01_A.JPG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20161228_nevada\/rinke_etal_2012_Pliocene_Sinistral_Slip_Adobe_Hills_in_press_fig_01_A.JPG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nSimplified tectonic map of the western U.S. Cordillera showing the modern plate boundaries and tectonic provinces. Basin and Range Province is in medium gray; Central Nevada seismic belt (CNSB), eastern California shear zone (ECSZ), Intermountain seismic belt (ISB), and Walker Lane belt (WLB) are in light gray; Mina deflection (MD) is in dark gray.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is the Amos et al. (2013) plate tectonic map. Check out the location of the historic surface rupturing earthquakes. Their figure caption is below (as for other figures here).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/amos_etal_2013_tectonics_little_late_CA_fig_01.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/amos_etal_2013_tectonics_little_late_CA_fig_01.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nOverview of active faults and regional topography of the Eastern California shear zone (ECSZ) and southern Walker Lane belt. Labeled faults are abbreviated as follows: ALF\u2014Airport Lake fault, BF\u2014Blackwater fault, GF\u2014Garlock fault, KCF\u2014Kern Canyon fault, LLF\u2014Little Lake fault, OVF\u2014Owens Valley fault, SNFF\u2014Sierra Nevada frontal fault. OL\u2014Owens Lake, IWV\u2014Indian Wells Valley. Major historical earthquake surface ruptures in the Eastern California shear zone and Walker Lane belt are outlined in white, with stars denoting epicentral locations: OV\u20141872 Owens Valley, L\u2014Landers 1992, HM\u20141999 Hector Mine. Active fault traces are taken from the U.S. Geological Survey Quaternary fault and fold database, with the exception of the Kern Canyon fault, taken from Brossy et al. (2012).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>This map extends a little farther to the east (Frankel et al., 2008). This map shows nicely how the Sierra Nevada and Owens Valley faults (the Pacific-North America plate boundary) and Eastern California Shear Zone, aka ECSZ (the maps south of the Garlock fault, 35.5N\u00b0) interact with east-west trending left-lateral strike-slip faults like the Garlock fault. The &#8217;92 Landers and &#8217;99 Hector Mine Earthquakes are on faults in the ECSZ.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/frankel_etal_2008_GSA_FieldTrip_eastern_CA_shear_zone_fig_01.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/frankel_etal_2008_GSA_FieldTrip_eastern_CA_shear_zone_fig_01.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nShaded relief index map of Quaternary faults, roads, towns, and fi eld trip stops in the eastern California shear zone. Most faults are from the U.S. Geological Survey Quaternary fault and fold database (http:\/\/earthquake.usgs.gov\/regional\/qfaults). Arrows indicate relative fault motion for strike slip faults. Bar and circle indicates the hanging wall of normal faults. Field trip stop location numbers are tied to site descriptions in the fi eld guide section. AHF\u2014Ash Hill fault; ALF\u2014Airport Lake fault; B\u2014Bishop; BF\u2014Blackwater fault; BLF\u2014Bicycle Lake fault; BM\u2014Black Mountains; BP\u2014Big Pine; Br\u2014Baker; Bw\u2014Barstow; By\u2014Beatty; CA\u2014California; CF\u2014Cady fault; CLF\u2014Coyote Lake fault; CoF\u2014Calico fault; CRF\u2014Camp Rock fault; DSF\u2014Deep Springs fault; DV-FLVF\u2014Death Valley\u2013Fish Lake Valley fault; EPF\u2014Emigrant Peak fault; EV\u2014 Eureka Valley; FIF\u2014Fort Irwin fault; FM\u2014Funeral Mountains; GF\u2014Garlock fault; GFL\u2014Goldstone Lake fault; GM\u2014Grapevine Mountains; HF\u2014Helendale fault; HLF\u2014Harper Lake fault; HMSVF\u2014Hunter Mountain\u2013Saline Valley fault; I\u2014Independence; LF\u2014Lenwood fault; LLF\u2014 Lavic Lake fault; LoF\u2014Lockhart fault; LP\u2014Lone Pine; LuF\u2014Ludlow fault; LV\u2014Las Vegas; M\u2014Mojave; MF\u2014Manix fault; NV\u2014Nevada; O\u2014Olancha; OL\u2014Owens Lake; OVF\u2014Owens Valley fault; P\u2014Pahrump; PF\u2014Pisgah fault; PV\u2014Panamint Valley; PVF\u2014Panamint Valley fault; R\u2014Ridgecrest; S\u2014Shoshone; SAF\u2014San Andreas fault; SDVF\u2014southern Death Valley fault; SLF\u2014Stateline fault; SPLM\u2014Silver Peak\u2013Lone Mountain extensional complex; SNF\u2014Sierra Nevada frontal fault; SP\u2014Silver Peak Range; T\u2014Tonopah; TF\u2014Tiefort Mountain fault; TMF\u2014Tin Mountain fault; TPF\u2014Towne Pass fault; WMF\u2014White Mountains fault; YM\u2014Yucca Mountain.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>This is also from Amos et al. (2013) that shows how some northeast striking normal faults are related to the Little Lake fault, in the northern part of Indian Wells Valley. The Little Lake fault connects to the Sierra Nevada frontal fault. <\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/amos_etal_2013_tectonics_little_late_CA_fig_02.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/amos_etal_2013_tectonics_little_late_CA_fig_02.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nSimplified geologic map of the Little Lake fault, highlighting Quaternary volcanic and alluvial deposits bearing on the Pleistocene drainage of Owens River through the Little Lake area. Map units are named and modified from Duffield and Bacon (1981). The 30 m elevation contours are taken from the National Elevation Database (NED). The <sup>40<\/sup>Ar\/<sup>39<\/sup>Ar dates are labeled as in Table 1. SNFF\u2014Sierra Nevada frontal fault.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is the Frankel et al. (2008) larger scale fault map, also focusing on the northern Indian Wells Valley.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/frankel_etal_2008_GSA_FieldTrip_eastern_CA_shear_zone_fig_09.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/frankel_etal_2008_GSA_FieldTrip_eastern_CA_shear_zone_fig_09.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nNorthward branching of the Holocene-active Airport Lake fault zone in northern Indian Wells Valley, Rose Valley, the Coso Range, and Wild Horse Mesa. AL\u2014Airport Lake playa; BR\u2014 basement ridge; CB\u2014Central branch; CWF\u2014Coso Wash fault; EB\u2014Eastern branch; GF\u2014geothermal field; HS\u2014 Haiwee Spring; LCF\u2014Lower Cactus Flat; MF\u2014McCloud Flat; UCF\u2014Upper Centennial Flat; WB\u2014Western branch; WHA\u2014White Hills anticline; WHM\u2014Wild Horse Mesa; WHMFZ\u2014 Wild Horse Mesa fault zone. Faults with especially prominent scarps in Wild Horse Mesa are highlighted in bold. Late Quaternary faults modified from Duffield and Bacon (1981) and Whitmarsh (1998), with additional original mapping. A and B indicate two faults that display evidence for late Quaternary dextral offset.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>This is the Stevens et al. (2013) map that shows the sedimentary basins in the region.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/stevens_etal_2013_evolution_eastern_sierra_fig_05.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/stevens_etal_2013_evolution_eastern_sierra_fig_05.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nMap showing interpreted thickness of Cenozoic deposits and major faults outlining the deep basins, based on inversion of gravity data [56]. Connection between West Inyo and Southwest Argus faults from Pluhar et al. [58]. ALFZ = Airport Lake Fault Zone; CWF = Coso Wash Fault; EIF = East Inyo Fault; LLF = Little Lake Fault. A-A&#8217; to H-H&#8217; indicate lines of cross sections and gravity profiles shown in Figure 10.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here are the fault blocks presented by Stevens et al. (2013).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/stevens_etal_2013_evolution_eastern_sierra_fig_07.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190704_searles_valley\/stevens_etal_2013_evolution_eastern_sierra_fig_07.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nMap showing deep basins, relatively shallow down-dropped blocks, extended mountain blocks, and structural zones in the ESVS, which is bounded by largely unextended mountain blocks. CB = Chalfant Basin; NBB = North Bishop Block; RVB = Round Valley Basin\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is a great overview map of the faults in the region from Oskin et al. (2008). Their paper is about their research to quantify the tectonic loading of faults in the Eastern California shear zone. Note that they use about 12 mm per year of Pacific-North America relative plate motion across this region.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/oskin_etal_2008_shear_loading_ECSZ_fig_01.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/oskin_etal_2008_shear_loading_ECSZ_fig_01.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nA: Index map of southwest North America showing geodetic provinces from Bennett et al. (2003) and location of Mojave block. Velocities of geodetically stable regions are shown relative to Colorado Plateau. ECSZ\u2014eastern California shear zone in Mojave block. Shear zone continues northward into western Great Basin province. GF\u2014Garlock fault. B: Index map of the Mojave block with active faults and locations of recent earthquake ruptures. Circles show localities of slip-rate measurements that sum to \u22646.2 \u00b1 1.9 mm\/yr across the ECSZ. GPS\u2014global positioning system.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is another good overview map, showing the faults for which Petersen and Wesnousky (1994) reviewed slip rates in that publication. They present an excellent review of all slip rate and paleoseismic investigations at the time that paper was published.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/petersen_wesnousky_1994_slip_rates_eq_hisotry_socal_fig_01.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/petersen_wesnousky_1994_slip_rates_eq_hisotry_socal_fig_01.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nMap showing sites of slip rate studies in southern California for the San Andreas (SAI-14), San Jacinto (SJI-13), Elsinore-Whittier (El-8), Newport- Inglewood (N1-3), Palos Verdes (N4-6), Rose Canyon (N7), Transverse Ranges (T1-50), Mojave (MI-6), and Garlock (G1-9) faults.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Oskin and Iriondo studied the Blackwater fault, the right-lateral strike-slip fault system that extends from the south into the region of the Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence. The Blackwater fault is connected to the south with the Calico fault (a fault between the 1992 and 1999 earthquakes). This appears to be the major Eastern California Shear zone fault that extends towards the Airport Valley and Little Lake faults (which ruptured during the Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/oskin_iriondo_2004_strain_accumulation_ECSZ_fig_01.PNG\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/oskin_iriondo_2004_strain_accumulation_ECSZ_fig_01.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nA: Index map of Pacific\u2013North America plate boundary through southwest North America. Principal faults are shown as thick black lines. Tectonically stable areas are outlined by dotted lines. Walker Lane and Eastern California shear zone, shown as dark gray band encompassing network of active faults, together absorb 9%\u201323% of total plate boundary shear (Dixon et al., 2000; Dokka and Travis, 1990a). JDF\u2014Juan de Fuca; MTJ\u2014 Mendocino triple junction. B: Index map of Eastern California shear zone showing fault slip rates (in parentheses, mm\/yr) determined by paleoseismic studies (Klinger and Piety, 2000; Lee et al., 2001; McGill and Sieh, 1993; Rockwell et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 1990). Heavy dark gray lines outline historic earthquake ruptures (Beanland and Clark, 1994; Sieh et al., 1993; Treiman et al., 2002). Heavy, medium gray band highlights Blackwater\u2013Calico fault system. Light gray band surrounding Blackwater fault and passing north of Garlock fault is zone of localized 1.2 6 0.5 mm\/yr strain accumulation documented by radar interferometry (Peltzer et al., 2001). C: Neotectonic map of Blackwater fault, showing type and orientation of fault line scarps with ticks on downthrown side. Dark patterned areas are lava flows cut by Blackwater fault (Dibblee, 1968, 1967; Smith, 1964)\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Peltzer et al. (2001) evaluate the amount of tectonic strain that has accumulated over time (see geodesy section to learn more about strain). First I present their tectonic map.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/peltzer_etal_2001_strain_accumulation_ECSZ_fig_01.PNG\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/peltzer_etal_2001_strain_accumulation_ECSZ_fig_01.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nTectonic map of southern California. Solid lines are active faults (Jennings, 1975). Yellow dots are relocated earthquakes between 1981 and 2000 (Hauksson, 2000). Dashed-line box is area covered by Earth Resource Satellite (ERS) data used in this study. White dashed line shows location of concentrated shear observed in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. Black stars indicate epicenters of recent earthquakes: OV\u20141872 Owens Valley, JT\u20141992 Joshua Tree, L\u20141992 Landers, BB\u20141992 Big Bear, N\u20141994 Northridge, RC\u20141994 and 1995 Ridgecrest, HM\u20141999 Hector Mine. Heavy solid lines depict surface ruptures of Landers (Sieh et al., 1993), Hector Mine (U.S. Geological Survey and California Division of Mines and<br \/>\n Geology, 2000; Peltzer et al., 2001), and Owens Valley (Beanland and Clark, 1994; only southern half of rupture is shown) earthquakes. Black dots and arrows show locations and observed velocities of 11 stations of Yucca GPS array (Gan et al., 2000).<br \/>\n* Faults are listed in the paper\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is the Guest et al. (2003) map showing their interpretation of how these faults developed over time.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/guest_etal_2003_chasing_garlock_fig_02.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/guest_etal_2003_chasing_garlock_fig_02.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nIn this model the Owlshead and southern Panamint blocks are hypothesized to have undergone sinistral transtension in response to a clockwise rotation of their southern confining boundary (Garlock fault zone).<br \/>\nRTR\u2014Radio Tower Range, SOM\u2014Southern Owlshead Mountains, WWFZ\u2014WingateWash fault zone, BMF\u2014Brown Mountain fault, OLF\u2014Owl Lake fault, GF\u2014Garlock fault, MSS\u2014Mule Springs strand, LLZ\u2014Leach Lake fault zone, SDVFZ\u2014Southern Death Valley fault zone.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><font color=orange><strong>Background Literature &#8211; Geodesy<\/strong><\/font><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Gan et al. (2003) present a summary of geodetic data where they show that the Owens Valley, Little Lake, and Helendale faults form the generalized western boundary of the Eastern California shear zone (there are additional right-lateral faults to the west however).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/gan_2003_deformation_ECSZ_fig_01.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/gan_2003_deformation_ECSZ_fig_01.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nMap showing the location of the ECSZ, the GPS arrays, the station velocities (relative to the fixed North America), and the principal faults in southern California (from Jennings [1992]). The thick dashed lines directed N23\u00b0W show the boundaries of the assumed parallel-sided ECSZ. The thin dashed lines extended from the segments of the Garlock fault show the trends of the segments.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>One of the challenges with interpreting geodetic data is comparing earthquake fault slip rates inferred from geodetic methods with rates calculated using geologic data (either from long term offsets of bedrock, or from more recent rates using fault trenches).<\/li>\n<li>Chuang and Johnson (2011) present their comparisons of GPS slip rates with geologic rates.<\/li>\n<ul>\n<li>Blue = geologic rate<\/li>\n<li>Black = geodetic rate<\/li>\n<li>Magenta = block model rate from their analyses<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/chuang_johnson_2011_geologic_geodetic_rates_so_cal_fig_01.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/chuang_johnson_2011_geologic_geodetic_rates_so_cal_fig_01.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nComparison of geologic fault slip rates (blue, mm\/yr) used in model, range of estimates from elastic block models (black) of Becker et al. (2005) and Meade and Hager (2005), and estimates from our block model (magenta) along major faults. Negative is left lateral. Light red lines are surface fault traces, and white thick lines are model blocks. Blue arrows are Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) crustal motion map 3 (Shen et al., 2003) velocities with respect to stable North America.<br \/>\n*See their paper for fault abbreviations.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is an interesting figure showing their (Chuang and Johnson, 2011) estimate of the relative position in the earthquake cycle for these faults. This is based on published recurrence intervals for these faults (the average time between earthquakes given paleoseismic investigation data).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/chuang_johnson_2011_geologic_geodetic_rates_so_cal_fig_02.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/chuang_johnson_2011_geologic_geodetic_rates_so_cal_fig_02.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nSummary of assumed geologic rates, recurrence interval (T), and time since last earthquake (teq) in Southern California. (For further discussion of sources of T and teq, see footnote 1). Blue numbers are expert opinion slip rates from Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (2008) and red numbers are rates from other paleoseismology data.<br \/>\nColor of rupture segment represents ratio of time since last earthquake and recurrence interval. Hot (red) colors show segments are in early earthquake cycle, and cold (blue) colors show late earthquake cycle.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>This is the summary of the Chuang and Johnson (2011) slip rate comparison.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/chuang_johnson_2011_geologic_geodetic_rates_so_cal_fig_03.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/chuang_johnson_2011_geologic_geodetic_rates_so_cal_fig_03.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nA: Geologic fault slip rates versus slip rates inferred from geodetic data. Geologic rates are summarized in Table DR1 (see footnote 1). Blue bars are slip rate comparisons from Meade and Hager (2005) and red bars are from this study. B: Normalized velocity across Garlock fault (blue), Mojave segment of San Andreas fault (red), and eastern California shear zone (ECSZ, green) from our cycle model. Black line is normalized velocity derived from elastic model.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is an earlier analysis comparing geodetic rates with geologic rates (Dixon et al., 2003). First we see a map showing the faults from which the fault comparisons are shown.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/dixon_etal_2003_paleoseismology_geodesy_ECSZ_fig_01.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/dixon_etal_2003_paleoseismology_geodesy_ECSZ_fig_01.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nSketch map of study area, modified from Dixon et al. (1995). Bar marks approximate location of Global Positioning System transect (Gan et al., 2000). GF\u2014 Garlock fault. Labeled faults of Eastern California shear zone: ALF\u2014 Airport Lake fault zone; OVF\u2014Owens Valley fault zone; HMF\u2014Hunter Mountain\u2013Panamint Valley fault zone; DVF\u2014 Death Valley\u2013Furnace<br \/>\nCreek fault zone; FLV\u2014 Fish Lake Valley fault zone.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is the east west profile from Dixon et al. (2003). The horizontal axis is distance and the vertical axis is the rate that each site moves in mm per year. Their fault modeling is represented by the dark black line.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/dixon_etal_2003_paleoseismology_geodesy_ECSZ_fig_02.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/dixon_etal_2003_paleoseismology_geodesy_ECSZ_fig_02.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nGlobal Positioning System velocity (triangles) and one standard error (bars) from Gan et al. (2000) compared to prediction of viscoelastic coupling model (heavy solid line), representing summed velocity contributions from four parallel faults (light dashed lines). SAF\u2014San Andreas fault; DVF\u2014Death Valley\u2013Furnace Creek fault zone; HMF\u2014Hunter Mountain\u2013Panamint Valley fault zone; OVF\u2014Owens Valley fault zone. Inset shows model rheology for Eastern California shear zone. SNB\u2014Sierra Nevada block;B&#038;R\u2014 Basin and Range Province; h is fault depth (depth of elastic layer) for three faults (a, b, or c), m is rigidity, h is viscosity. Arrows mark location of major shear-zone faults.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Peltzer et al. (2001) use synthetic aperture radar interferometry (see my <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8806\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">second update report for more on InSAR anslysis<\/a>) to measure tectonic deformation that accumulated between 1992-2000.<\/li>\n<li>The Coso Geothermal Field is the rainbow area in the northernmost part of the map. Indian Wells Valley is the green area to the south of the Coso Field. This is an area of elevated strain. The Garlock fault is the ~east-west black line in the center of the white inset box.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/peltzer_etal_2001_strain_accumulation_ECSZ_fig_03.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/peltzer_etal_2001_strain_accumulation_ECSZ_fig_03.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nSurface velocity map obtained by averaging 25 interferograms of Los Angeles\u2013Mojave region. One color cycle depicts 10 mm\/yr of surface displacement along radar line of sight (at lat N348; ERS [Earth Resource Satellite] descending track trends S13.68W, radar looking westward at 238 off vertical incidence angle in middle of imaged swath). Gray areas are zones of low phase coherence that have been masked in processing. Black lines are active faults (Jennings, 1975). White box indicates subset of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data that was used for profile in Figure 4. Note conspicuous shear strain along San Andreas fault and shear zone parallel to Blackwater\u2013Little Lake fault system. Large deformation signal in northwest corner of frame is ground subsidence related to Coso volcanic and geothermal field (Fig. 1). Surface displacement associated with 1994 and 1995 Ridgecrest earthquakes is visible south of Coso area. Other patterns of surface deformation include ground subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal in Los Angeles and Lancaster areas (Fig. 1) and to seasonal change of water table level around dry lakes.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Peltzer et al. (2001) plot observations from their radar data showing relative plate motion associated with dislocation along the Blackwater-Little Lake fault system.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/peltzer_etal_2001_strain_accumulation_ECSZ_fig_04.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/peltzer_etal_2001_strain_accumulation_ECSZ_fig_04.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nProfiles of observed and modeled line-of-sight displacement projected on vertical plane perpendicular to shear zone. Gray dots are individual data points for all radar-image pixels included in box shown in Figure 3. Solid line shows 2 km running mean of observed displacement along profile length. Note that apparent standard deviation of projected data relative to average profile reflects in part displacement gradient parallel to fault strike and not only error in data. Groups of dots that deviate from dense part of profile are due to ground subsidence near lake shores and to surface displacement associated with Ridgecrest earthquakes (Figs. 1, 3). Short-dash line is profile predicted by long-term velocity model used to estimate interferometric baseline (Shen et al., 1996). Long-dash line is profile predicted by velocity model, including additional buried dislocation along Blackwater\u2013Little Lake fault system. Parameters of added fault are given in text. Black dots and error bars (2s) are line-of-sight projections of horizontal velocities  observed by GPS at stations of Yucca transect (Gan et al., 2000).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<\/ul>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><font color=orange><strong>Background Literature &#8211; Owens Valley fault<\/strong><\/font><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Kylander-Clark et al. (2005) use the lateral offset of plutonic dikes (igneous rocks) to constrain a long term slip rate across the Owens Valley fault. This map shows one of the dike pairs used in their analysis. By knowing the age of these dieks, and the distance that they have been offset, we can obtain a slip rate.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/kylander_clark_etal_2005_65_km_slip_owens_valley_fault_fig_01.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/kylander_clark_etal_2005_65_km_slip_owens_valley_fault_fig_01.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nLocations of the Golden Bear and Coso dikes, adjacent to Owens Valley. Main figure shows the Golden Bear and Coso dikes striking into the valley, where they intrude 102 Ma plutons. Both the dikes and the plutons provide distinctive markers that can be matched across the valley and are consistent with 65 km of dextral displacement since 84 Ma. Inset shows other markers across Owens Valley that earlier workers suggested indicate from 0 to 65 km of dextral offset across the valley. Also shown are the traces of the Tinemaha fault (Stevens et al., 1997; Stevens and Stone, 2002) and intrabatholithic break 3 (IBB3; Kistler, 1993), which are hypothesized to accommodate offset of these markers. Note that the section of IBB3 between 38\u00b0N and 36.5\u00b0N is correlative with the eastern intrabatholithic break (EIB) of Saleeby and Busby (1993). Not all known locations of Independence dikes are indicated. Instead, patterned areas show only the densest parts of the dike swarm as defi ned by Glazner et al. (2003). AR\u2014Argus Range; CR\u2014Coso Range; IR\u2014Inyo Range; WM\u2014White Mountains\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Bacon and Pezzopane used trench excavations across earthquake faults to construct a prehistoric earthquake history for the Owens Valley fault. Below is their tectonic map for the region.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_01.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_01.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n(A) Map of major Quaternary faults in the northern Eastern California shear zone and southern and central Walker Lane, as well as the locations of the Owens Valley fault. Faults are modified from Reheis and Dixon (1996) and Wesnousky (2005)<br \/>\n(B) Generalized fault and geology map of south-central Owens Valley, showing the A.D. 1872 Owens Valley fault rupture and major fault zones in the valley (modified from Hollett et al. [1991] and Beanland and Clark [1994]).<br \/>\n(For fault abbreviations, see their paper.)\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>This map shows a more detailed view of the Owens Valley fault and the Owens Lake topography (Bacon and Pezzopane, 2007).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_02_A.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_02_A.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nShaded relief map of southern Owens Valley showing fault zones and the ages of the most recent prominent highstands and recessional shorelines of Owens Lake during the latest Quaternary (modified from Bacon et al., 2006).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<li>This map shows the Bacon and Pezzopane (2007) field sites.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_02_B.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_02_B.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nMap of the field area and locations of paleoseismic study sites in relation to the A.D. 1872 Owens Valley earthquake fault trace near Lone Pine. Study sites are located on the Alabama Hills (AHS), Diaz Lake (DLS), and Manzanar (MZS) sections of the Owens Valley fault zone mapped by Bryant (1988) and Beanland and Clark (1994) from 1:12,000 aerial photographs.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>An essential part of any earthquake fault investigation is knowledge about the geologic units that are offset by the fault. Bacon and Pezzopane (2007) also described and interpreted the sediment stratigraphy in southern Owens Valley as part of their research. <\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_05.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_05.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nSchematic composite stratigraphic column. The generalized stratigraphic and geochronologic relations, developed from exposures at the Alabama Gates and Quaker paleoseismic sites and Owens River bluffs near Lone Pine (Bacon et al., 2006), show the positions of radiocarbon dates, sequence boundaries, and event chronologies as discussed in the text.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>The geologic method (McCalpin, 1996) is based on the offset of geologic materials like sedimentary deposits or bedrock lithologic units. Below are trench logs showing the geologic units that Bacon and Pezzopane (2007) use to infer an earthquake history. Geologic evidence is &#8220;primary&#8221; evidence for earthquakes.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_04.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_04.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is a time series showing the sedimentary and earthquake history as interpreted by Bacon and Pezzopane (2007).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_08.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_08.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nSchematic depiction of stratigraphy and structural relations at the Quaker paleoseismic site prior to the penultimate event and after the A.D. 1872 earthquake (depictions A\u2013H). The stratigraphy and structure exposed in trench T5 (Fig. 7) was retrodeformed and reconstructed one event at a time (while also accounting for other stratigraphic and<br \/>\n paleoseismic relations exposed in adjacent fault trenches and stratigraphic pits). The locations of sequence boundaries (SB0\u2013SB4) are shown and can be referenced on Figure 5.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Haddon et al. (2013) compiled fault offset measurements and presented a summary here, showing the slip distribution along the fault (along strike). The measurements plotted below represent measurements of offsets of features as measured in high resolution LiDAR topographic data. They separate data into lateral offset (the amount of strike-slip relative motion) and throw offset (the amount of normal relative motion, from extension).<\/li>\n<li>We can see that the fault has both strike-slip and normal offsets, with strike-slip the dominant relative motion.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/haddon_etal_2013_Surface_Slip_During_Large_Owens_Valley_Fault_Earthquakes_fig_08.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/haddon_etal_2013_Surface_Slip_During_Large_Owens_Valley_Fault_Earthquakes_fig_08.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nCompilation of small geomorphic offsets measured from lidar using LaDiCaoz_v2 along average OVF strike (3408) (supporting information Tables S2 and S3). Data include confidence ratings of low-moderate to high and omit net values determined by summing. Gray error bars show uncertainty limits determined visually from back-slipping. (a) The spatial distribution of OVF scarps (red lines) mapped from EarthScope lidar and classified by Owens Valley fault section (orange and black points), following previous mapping by Beanland and Clark [1994], Bryant [1984a, 1984b], and Slemmons et al. [2008]. Nearby faults are taken from the U.S. Geological Survey Quaternary fault and fold database. From south to north: DS, Dirty Socks; OL, Owens Lake; LP, Lone Pine fault; DL, Diaz Lake; IS, southern Independence; MF, Manzanar fault; I, Independence; T, Tinemaha; TW, western Tinemaha; FS, Fish Springs; BP, Big Pine; K, Keough section of Sierra Nevada frontal fault (SNNF), KLF, Klondike Lake fault; KSF, Klondike Springs fault; WMF, White Mountain fault. (b) Right-lateral offset measurements symbolized by fault section include previously reported values (orange diamonds) from Bateman [1961], Lubetkin and Clark [1988], Beanland and Clark [1994], Lee et al. [2001a], Zehfuss et al. [2001], and Slemmons et al. [2008]. (c) Along-strike compilation of measured vertical throw. Throw is predominantly east-down, with negative values indicative of downward motion to the west.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>This is a spectacular plot showing the along-strike variation in offset measurements.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/haddon_etal_2013_Surface_Slip_During_Large_Owens_Valley_Fault_Earthquakes_fig_10.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/haddon_etal_2013_Surface_Slip_During_Large_Owens_Valley_Fault_Earthquakes_fig_10.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nFrequency distributions and cumulative offset probability density (COPD) plots for lateral and vertical offsets, compiled using bin sizes of 1 and 0.25 m, respectively (supporting information Tables S2 and S3). Histograms omit uncertainties, whereas COPD plots incorporate PDFs generated by the cross-correlation routine and truncated based on the range of uncertainty from back-slipping. Data are color-coded according to major sections of the OVF. (a) Scarps along the southern, central, and northern sections of the OVF relative to volcanic flows (purple) and a few representative elevation contours, generally corresponding to recognized pluviallacustrine features (#1\u20134) [Bacon et al., 2006; Jayko and Bacon, 2008; Bacon et al., 2013; Bacon et al., 2014]. Age estimates for features documented near (1) 1180 m, (2) 1162 m, (3) 1131 m, and (4) 1101 m are 160632 ka [Jayko and Bacon, 2008], 23,230\u201326,250 cal yr BP [Bacon et al., 2006], 15,870\u201316,230 cal yr BP [Bacon et al., 2014], and 300630 to 400630 yr BP [Bacon et al., 2013], respectively. Green points mark surface slip measurements based on geomorphic features. CM, Crater Mountain. Volcanic flows are from the California Geological Survey. (b\u2013e) Optimum offset values for the southern (yellow), central (blue), and northern (red) sections are grouped and shaded by confidence rating. COPD plots use moderate to high confidence offsets and incorporate summed values.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is the plot from Haddon et al. (2013) that shows a summary of their displacement measurements from the Owens Valley and Lone Pine faults. The lower panel shows these measurements combined.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/haddon_etal_2013_Surface_Slip_During_Large_Owens_Valley_Fault_Earthquakes_fig_13.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/haddon_etal_2013_Surface_Slip_During_Large_Owens_Valley_Fault_Earthquakes_fig_13.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nNet 1872 surface slip derived from moderate to high confidence displacements plotted along subparallel strands. Gray bars reflect aggregated uncertainties from back-slipping of lidar imagery. (a) Along-strike compilation of displacement values for main traces of the OVF, as predicted by binned COPD plots. (b) Along-strike compilation of Lone Pine fault displacements. (c) Summed distributions (red lines) for possible net 1872 surface slip along a simplified<br \/>\n fault plane striking 3408 and dipping 808 northeast. The maximum implied displacement is between 7 and 11 m and reflects the average of four high values. The net slip averages 4.461.5 m based on a 5-km binned average that incorporates graphical values for gaps between higher confidence data.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is their summary map showing slip rates for each of the faults used in their study (Haddon et al., 2013).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/haddon_etal_2013_Surface_Slip_During_Large_Owens_Valley_Fault_Earthquakes_fig_16.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/haddon_etal_2013_Surface_Slip_During_Large_Owens_Valley_Fault_Earthquakes_fig_16.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nCompilation of reported slip rates in mm\/yr on active faults in the southern Walker Lane (modified from Foy et al. [2012]) with rspect to the geodetic rate across the zone derived from the global positioning system and the relative motion of the Sierra Nevada\u2013 Great Valley microplate [Lifton et al., 2013]. Geologic slip rate studies, from south to north: Amos et al. [2013b], (this study), Oswald and Wesnousky [2002], Frankel et al. [2007a,b], Lubetkin and Clark [1988], Reheis and Sawyer [1997], Lee et al. [2001b], Ganev et al. [2010], Kirby et al. [2006], and Nagorsen-Rinke et al. [2013]. Faults listed alphabetically: AHF, Adobe Hills fault; ALF, Airport Lake fault; BMF, Black Mountain fault; DSF, Deep Springs fault; FCF, Furnace Creek fault; FLVF, Fish Lake Valley fault; HMF, Hunter Mountain fault; LLF, Little Lake fault; OVF, Owens Valley fault; NDVF, Northern Death Valley fault; PVF, Panamint Valley fault; QVF, Queen Valley fault; SAF, San Andreas fault; SNFF, Sierra Nevada frontal fault; SVF, Saline Valley fault; WMF, White Mountain fault.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Dr. Steve Bacon was first infected with the quest for knowledge about the tectonics of the Owens Valley when he attended the 1997 Pacific Cell Friends of the Pleistocene field trip to Owens Valley. IF anyone has a scan of the 1997 Owens Valley guidebook, please contact me.<\/li>\n<li>Dr. Bacon chose to study the Owens Valley fault for his Masters Thesis work at Humboldt State University, Department of Geology. I was lucky enough to help him do some of this work as I was also attending HSU at the time. I also remembering how another researcher had failed to listed to Steve, yet they published a paper where they measured post-earthquake features as it they were offset during the earthquake. The peer review process is imperfect sometimes.<\/li>\n<li>Being a sediment stratigrapher, I appreciate the fact that the key preface to consducting a paleoseismic investigation is developing knowledge about the stratigraphy in the region. This was a major part of Dr. Bacon&#8217;s research. Please read more about his analysis of the lake level variations for the past 50,000 years in the Owens Lake in his recently published article (Bacon et al., 2020) listed in the references.<\/li>\n<li>Here is the Bacon et al. (2019) overview map that shows the spatial extent of the 1872 Owens Valley fault earthquake rupture.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_fig_01_B.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_fig_01_B.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nMap of primary faults and rocks of the Big Pine volcanic field in south-central Owens Valley. The A.D. 1872 Owens Valley fault rupture and fault segments of the OVF and SNFF are shown (modified from Bacon and Pezzopane, 2007). Faults: CFF\u2014Centennial Flat fault; KF\u2014Keeler fault; ORF\u2014Owens River fault; SFF\u2014Sage Flat fault. Numbers show sites on OVF referred to in text of: 1\u2014Kirby et al. (2008); 2\u2014Lee et al. (2001); and 3\u2014Bacon and Pezzopane (2007).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is a map showing the detailed faults in the Owens Lake area, which is the focus of their study (Bacon et al., 2019). These authors used the geometric position of geomorphic features (like shorelines), along with numerical ages of those features (the time that they formed), to calculate long term slip rates for these faults.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_fig_02.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_fig_02.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nMap of primary faults in Owens Lake basin and elevations of deformed shoreline features (\u223c1156\u20131166 m) used to estimate the magnitude of ground deformation and slip rates across faults in the lake basin. Faults are modified after Bacon et al. (2005) and Slemmons et al. (2008). Faults: CFF\u2014Centennial Flat fault; COLF\u2014Central Owens Lake fault; IMF\u2014Inyo Mountains fault; KF\u2014Keeler fault; ORF\u2014Owens River fault; OVF\u2014Owens Valley fault; SIMF\u2014southern Inyo Mountains fault; and SNFF\u2014Sierra Nevada frontal fault. The location of the Sage Flat fault (SFF) after Jayko (2009) and Amos et al. (2013a) is also shown. Plunging anticlines from Frankel et al. (2008). Reference elevation contours at 1096 and 1160 m represent the margin of Owens Lake playa and the approximate location of ca. 40.0 ka shoreline features, respectively. Modern sill is also shown relative to the 1160 m elevation that defines the overflow  channel of the basin. Sediment lake core OL92 of Smith and Bischoff (1997) is shown relative to the depocenter area of the lake basin. Approximate location of transect for repeat leveling surveys near Lone Pine of Savage and Lisowski (1980, 1995) is also shown. K\u2014town of Keeler; S\u2014Swansea embayment; O\u2014town of Olancha.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>This is a summary of fault characteristics as presented by Bacon et al. (2019). Dip-slip rate is the slip rate as measured up and down along the fault (in the direction that water would drip if it were placed on the fault). The extension rate is the slip rate measured horizontally in the same direction.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_table_02.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_table_02.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is another map of the Owens Lake area, showing these slip rates and cross section locations for sections shown below (Bacon et al., 2019).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_fig_09.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_fig_09.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nGeneralized fault map of Owens Lake basin showing slip rates from this study and previous investigations. Faults: CFF\u2014Centennial Flat fault; COLF\u2014Central Owens Lake fault; IMF\u2014Inyo Mountains fault; KF\u2014Keeler fault; ORF\u2014Owens River fault; OVF\u2014Owens Valley fault; SFF\u2014Sage Flat fault; SIMF\u2014southern Inyo Mountains fault; SNFF\u2014Sierra Nevada frontal fault. Extension direction at N72\u00b0E normal to Owens Valley is shown with geologic extension rate from this study and geodetic extension rates from trilateration networks in the valley (Savage and Lisowski, 1995) and GPS arrays across northern Owens Valley (Ganev et al., 2010a). The location of transects A\u2013A\u2032, B\u2013B\u2032, and C\u2013C\u2032 used in cross sections are shown. K\u2014town of Keeler; S\u2014Swansea embayment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here are the cross sections showing the faults as these authors (Bacon et al., 2019) interpret their geometry in the subsurface.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_fig_10.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_fig_10.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nCross sections showing orientation of faults and sense of slip, and reconstructed water levels of the ca. 40 ka highstand pluvial lake in Owens Lake basin. Faults: CFF\u2014Centennial Flat fault; COLF\u2014Central Owens Lake fault; IMF\u2014Inyo Mountains fault; KF\u2014Keeler fault; ORF\u2014Owens River fault; OVF\u2014Owens Valley fault; SFF\u2014Sage Flat fault; SIMF\u2014southern Inyo Mountains fault; SNFF\u2014Sierra Nevada frontal fault. Fault orientations are apparent dip based on fault strike across transects. Inferred locations of IMF and SIMF on transect A\u2013A\u2032 are from Pakiser et al. (1964) and Bacon et al. (2005).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is a figure that shows a summary of their analysis (Bacon et al., 2019). Read the caption below to help yourself to understand this figure. It is complicated, but simple at the same time. Read their paper to learn more about this comprehensive and amazing research.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_fig_11.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200624_lone_pine\/bacon_etal_2019_Spatiotemporal_patterns_owens_valley_fault_fig_11.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nPlots showing the elevation of: (A) deformed ca. 40 ka shoreline features and lowstand beach ridge deposits, and (B) ca. 15 cal k.y. B.P. shorelines features and deformed fluvial-deltaic deposits. The elevation of shoreline features and deposits are projected onto transect B\u2013B\u2032 and shown in relation to the generalized location of faults in Owens Lake basin (Fig. 9). Magnitude of ground deformation shown is \u223c10 m subsidence relative to the ca. 40 ka reconstructed water level (i.e., paleohorizontal datum) and \u223c3.6 m fault separation on the Keeler fault of the ca. 40 ka beach ridge crests. The elevation and age of fluvial deltaic deposits on the hanging wall of the Owens Valley fault are from paleoseismic fault trench data (Bacon and Pezzopane, 2007). Faults: CFF\u2014Centennial Flat fault; COLF\u2014 Central Owens Lake fault; KF\u2014Keeler fault; ORF\u2014Owens River fault; OVF\u2014Owens Valley fault; SIMF\u2014southern Inyo Mountains fault; NFF\u2014Sierra Nevada frontal fault. Actual dips of faults are not shown. Vertical sense of slip is indicated by arrows. Lateral slip is indicated by crosses (away) and dots (toward). The elevation errors from GPS survey of shoreline features and deposits are less than width of symbols.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2><font color=orange><strong>Background Literature &#8211; Earthquake History<\/strong><\/font><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Here are the results of the paleoseismic (prehistoric earthquake history) investigation for the Owens Valley fault (Bacon and Pezzopane, 2007).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_09.PNG\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190705_ridgecrest\/references\/bacon_pezzopane_2007_25ka_earthquake_history_owens_valley_fault_fig_09.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nFault segmentation and section map of central and southern Owens Valley showing overlap and possible distributive faulting and linkage between the northern segment of the Owens Valley fault (OVF) and southern White Mountains fault (WMF) near Big Pine. The trace of the A.D. Owens Valley fault rupture and section boundaries of Beanland and Clark (1994) and segment boundaries of dePolo et al. (1991) are shown in relation to the central and southern White Mountains fault and the location of the Black Mountain rupture of dePolo (1989). RRF\u2014Red Ridge fault; LP\u2014Lone Pine; I\u2014Independence; BP\u2014Big Pine; OSL\u2014optically stimulated luminescence; PE\u2014Penultimate event; APE\u2014antepenultimate event; MRE\u2014most recent event.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<h2> <strong><font color=orange>San Andreas plate boundary<\/font><\/strong> <\/h2>\n<h3>General Overview<\/h3>\n<li>1906.04.18 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8428\">M 7.9 San Francisco<\/a><\/li>\n<h3>Earthquake Reports<\/h3>\n<h4>Northern CA<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>2017.12.14 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=6593\">M 4.3 Laytonville<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2016.11.06 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=4469\">M 4.1 Laytonville, CA<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2016.11.03 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=4451\">M 3.8 Laytonville, CA<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2016.08.10 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=4152\">M 5.1 Lake Pillsbury, CA<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2016.08.04 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=4163\">M 4.5 Honey Lake, CA<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>2015.08.30 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=2789\">M 3.6 Mendocino County, CA<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2015.07.27 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=2746\">M 3.5 Point Arena, CA<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Central CA<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>2018.07.30 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=7481\">M 3.7 San Pablo Bay<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2018.01.04 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=6815\">M 4.4 Berkeley<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>1989.10.18 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8992\">M 6.9 Loma Prieta<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Southern CA<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>2020.06.24 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=9580\">M 5.8 Lone Pine<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>2019.07.04 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8656\">M 6.4 Ridgecrest<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2019.07.05 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8706\">M 6.4 \/ 7.1 Ridgecrest Update #1<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2019.07.18 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8806\">M 6.4 \/ 7.1 Ridgecrest Update #2<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2019.07.20 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8850\">M 6.4 \/ 7.1 Ridgecrest Update #3<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2019.06.05 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8571\">M 4.3 San Clemente Island<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>2018.04.05 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=7311\">M 5.3 Channel Islands<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2018.04.05 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=7331\">M 5.3 Channel Islands Update #1<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>2016.02.23 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=3758\">M 4.9 Bakersfield<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>2015.12.30 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=3469\">M 4.4 San Bernardino, CA<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2015.05.03 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=2412\">M 3.8 Los Angeles, CA<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2015.04.13 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=2334\">M 3.3 Los Angeles, CA<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>2014.04.01 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=1466\">M 5.1 La Habra p-3<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2014.03.29 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=1456\">M 5.1 La Habra p-2<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2014.03.28 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=1435\">M 5.1 La Habra p-1<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>1994.11.17 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=4835\">M 6.7 Northridge, CA<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>1971.02.09 <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=7092\">M 6.7 Sylmar, CA<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<h2><strong><font color=\"orange\">Social Media<\/font><\/strong><\/h2>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/EarthquakeReport?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#EarthquakeReport<\/a> for M5.8 Owens Valley fault zone<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Earthquake<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Terremoto?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Terremoto<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Landslide?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Landslide<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Liquefaction?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Liquefaction<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Aftershocks?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Aftershocks<\/a><\/p>\n<p>prob (?) related to static coulomb stress changes following <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/RidgecrestEarthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#RidgecrestEarthquake<\/a> Sequence <br \/>prob (?) not aftershock from 1872 M7.8-9 OVF EQ<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/Ux1s5W1Dph\">https:\/\/t.co\/Ux1s5W1Dph<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/KY22aJLFU4\">pic.twitter.com\/KY22aJLFU4<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jason &quot;Jay&quot; R. Patton (@patton_cascadia) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/patton_cascadia\/status\/1277299350347997184?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 28, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"es\" dir=\"ltr\">Deslizamientos de Tierra en las Monta\u00f1as de Lone Pine, tras Terremoto de M6.1 en California, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/US?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#US<\/a>. (24.06.2020). <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Earthquake<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Nevada?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Nevada<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Owens?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Owens<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Alico?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Alico<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Keeler?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Keeler<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/MT?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#MT<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Whitney?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Whitney<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Sismo?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Sismo<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Temblor?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Temblor<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Landslide?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Landslide<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/zabedrosky?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#zabedrosky<\/a> <\/p>\n<p>By: Steven Wheeler \u2713. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/YdtWiOdjVF\">pic.twitter.com\/YdtWiOdjVF<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; &#x26a0;David de Zabedrosky&#x1f30e; (@deZabedrosky) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/deZabedrosky\/status\/1275860637571256321?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 24, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"und\" dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/KDLTpayYhr\">https:\/\/t.co\/KDLTpayYhr<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jason &quot;Jay&quot; R. Patton (@patton_cascadia) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/patton_cascadia\/status\/1275917672765550593?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 24, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">The 2019 M 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake struck 50 mi to the south of today&#39;s quake. Temblor&#39;s forecast (Toda &amp; Stein, BSSA, in press) suggests that stress transfer from the Ridgecrest events primed Lone Pine, and other areas, for subsequent quakes. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/KHDNsckIOb\">pic.twitter.com\/KHDNsckIOb<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; temblor (@temblor) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/temblor\/status\/1275939844519149568?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 24, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"und\" dir=\"ltr\"> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/SyDYUzFbQB\">pic.twitter.com\/SyDYUzFbQB<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; John Chrissinger (@JChrissinger) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/JChrissinger\/status\/1275945816457220097?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 25, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Auto solution FMNEAR (G\u00e9oazur\/OCA) with regional records for the 2020-06-24 17:40:48.8 UTC M6.8 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, USA (Loc EMSC used to trigger inversion).<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/UHDsc1hVXA\">https:\/\/t.co\/UHDsc1hVXA<\/a> (not on mobile version)<br \/>Thanks to the seismic records provided by NCEDC, SCEC, and IRIS <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/wO6bKkbxwx\">pic.twitter.com\/wO6bKkbxwx<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Bertrand Delouis (@BertrandDelouis) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/BertrandDelouis\/status\/1275898112649953282?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 24, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">When I got to the lower trailhead parking lot I saw this scar in the asphalt and an illegally parked boulder. \u201cSomething is *afoot*!\u201d, I whispered to myself. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/OwensLakeEarthqauke?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#OwensLakeEarthqauke<\/a> 4\/ <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/1BeW9qEMOW\">pic.twitter.com\/1BeW9qEMOW<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Brian OLSON-19 (@mrbrianolson) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/mrbrianolson\/status\/1275977273095540736?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 25, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Recent Earthquake Teachable Moment | M5.8 earthquake near Lone Pine, CA<\/p>\n<p>IRIS Teachable Moments contains interpreted USGS regional tectonic maps and summaries, computer animations, seismograms, AP photos, and other event-specific information.<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/GqGHSc2CA7\">https:\/\/t.co\/GqGHSc2CA7<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/zpQmFWHIvD\">pic.twitter.com\/zpQmFWHIvD<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; IRIS Earthquake Sci (@IRIS_EPO) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/IRIS_EPO\/status\/1276099428558999554?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 25, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Amazing that there are no documented injuries or missing people following yesterday\u2019s 5.8 magnitude quake and resulting rockslide at Whitney Portal. <\/p>\n<p>Fingers crossed it stays that way. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/4wm9ZCBxxP\">pic.twitter.com\/4wm9ZCBxxP<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jacob Margolis (@JacobMargolis) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/JacobMargolis\/status\/1276210362614820866?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 25, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">The 5 Hz GPS velocities from yesterdays M5.8 Lone Pine earthquake show good correspondence with the existing ShakeMap. The triangles are the nearby seismic sites. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/UNAVCO?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@UNAVCO<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/Vbz6JdLnTR\">pic.twitter.com\/Vbz6JdLnTR<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Brendan Crowell (@bwcphd) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/bwcphd\/status\/1276254262700343296?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 25, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Surface deformation revealed by Sentinel-1 interferogram of the Mw 5.8 <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/LonePine?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#LonePine<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#earthquake<\/a> . <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/N7AZLm0nwj\">pic.twitter.com\/N7AZLm0nwj<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Kang Wang (@kjellywang) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/kjellywang\/status\/1276937090807169024?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 27, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"ro\" dir=\"ltr\">M5.8 Lone Pine, CA (2020.06.24)<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/SIueo6em6W\">https:\/\/t.co\/SIueo6em6W<\/a><br \/>Sentinel Path 144 (2020.06.21-2020.06.27)<br \/>v1:<br \/>Centroid lon\/lat:-117.975\/ 36.488<br \/>Centroid depth (km): 13.24<br \/>Depth range (km): 7.98-18.5<br \/>Geodetic Mag: Mw5.8<br \/>Slip mag (m): 0.297<br \/>Str\/Dip\/Rake: 339\/67\/132<br \/>Len\/Wid (km): 5.67\/11.40 <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/qw3Ovjp1bO\">pic.twitter.com\/qw3Ovjp1bO<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; gCent (@gCentBulletin) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/gCentBulletin\/status\/1276966808197697536?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 27, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">The cumulative stress change caused by the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence (Mw6.4 and Mw7.1) show a positive stress loading (in red) on the Mw 5.8 Lone Pine earthquake (orange circle). <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/R1IuVUu2pN\">pic.twitter.com\/R1IuVUu2pN<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jugurtha Kariche (@JkaricheKariche) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/JkaricheKariche\/status\/1275959150384746496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 25, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Lone Pine is well worth the visit. And the 1872 event is memorialized there with a plaque in town and the group grave just north of town where 27 people who died in the quake were buried. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/7m11lu98jw\">pic.twitter.com\/7m11lu98jw<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Dan Brekke (@danbrekke) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/danbrekke\/status\/1275876886552272896?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 24, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Today&#39;s T64 <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Sentinel1?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Sentinel1<\/a> interferograms for the M5.8 Lone Pine \/ Owens Lake Ca <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#earthquake<\/a> were really bad &#8211; so let&#39;s stick to the first one (T144) from yesterday. 2-3cm of LOS ground displacement over Owens Lake area. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/InSAR?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#InSAR<\/a> proc. at <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/esa_gep?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@esa_gep<\/a>. Epicenters, faults &amp; FM from USGS 1\/2 <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/N9syXVzVm9\">pic.twitter.com\/N9syXVzVm9<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Sotiris Valkaniotis (@SotisValkan) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SotisValkan\/status\/1277302390727852033?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 28, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">A 3D of the rock fall\/debris location in the Lone Pine slope over Whitney Portal. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/landslides?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#landslides<\/a> triggered from the M5.8 June 24 earthquake. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Sentinel2?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Sentinel2<\/a> image from June 27 2020. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/nt1bIqeWEm\">pic.twitter.com\/nt1bIqeWEm<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Sotiris Valkaniotis (@SotisValkan) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SotisValkan\/status\/1277276979432226817?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 28, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<h2><strong><font color=\"orange\">References:<\/font><\/strong><\/h2>\n<h3>Basic &#038; General References<\/h3>\n<li>Frisch, W., Meschede, M., Blakey, R., 2011. Plate Tectonics, Springer-Verlag, London, 213 pp.<\/li>\n<li>Hayes, G., 2018, Slab2 &#8211; A Comprehensive Subduction Zone Geometry Model: U.S. Geological Survey data release, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5066\/F7PV6JNV\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5066\/F7PV6JNV<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Holt, W. E., C. Kreemer, A. J. Haines, L. Estey, C. Meertens, G. Blewitt, and D. Lavallee (2005), Project helps constrain continental dynamics and seismic hazards, Eos Trans. AGU, 86(41), 383\u2013387, , <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2005EO410002\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"> https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2005EO410002<\/a>. \/li>\n<li>Jessee, M.A.N., Hamburger, M. W., Allstadt, K., Wald, D. J., Robeson, S. M., Tanyas, H., et al. (2018). A global empirical model for near-real-time assessment of seismically induced landslides. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 123, 1835\u20131859. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2017JF004494\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2017JF004494<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Kreemer, C., J. Haines, W. Holt, G. Blewitt, and D. Lavallee (2000), On the determination of a global strain rate model, Geophys. J. Int., 52(10), 765\u2013770. <\/li>\n<li>Kreemer, C., W. E. Holt, and A. J. Haines (2003), An integrated global model of present-day plate motions and plate boundary deformation, Geophys. J. Int., 154(1), 8\u201334, , <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1365-246X.2003.01917.x\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1365-246X.2003.01917.x<\/a>. <\/li>\n<li>Kreemer, C., G. Blewitt, E.C. Klein, 2014. A geodetic plate motion and Global Strain Rate Model in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, v. 15, p. 3849-3889, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/2014GC005407\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/2014GC005407<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Meyer, B., Saltus, R., Chulliat, a., 2017. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ngdc.noaa.gov\/geomag\/emag2.html\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">EMAG2: Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid (2-arc-minute resolution) Version <\/a>3. National Centers for Environmental Information, NOAA. Model. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7289\/V5H70CVX\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7289\/V5H70CVX<\/a><\/li>\n<li>M\u00fcller, R.D., Sdrolias, M., Gaina, C. and Roest, W.R., 2008, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.earthbyte.org\/people\/dietmar\/Pdf\/Muller_etal_age_rate_asym_G3_2008.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Age spreading rates and spreading asymmetry of the world&#8217;s ocean crust<\/a> in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9, Q04006, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2007GC001743\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2007GC001743<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Pagani,M. , J. Garcia-Pelaez, R. Gee, K. Johnson, V. Poggi, R. Styron, G. Weatherill, M. Simionato, D. Vigan\u00f2, L. Danciu, D. Monelli (2018). Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Seismic Hazard Map (version 2018.1 &#8211; December 2018), DOI: 10.13117\/GEM-GLOBAL-SEISMIC-HAZARD-MAP-2018.1<\/li>\n<li>Silva, V ., D Amo-Oduro, A Calderon, J Dabbeek, V Despotaki, L Martins, A Rao, M Simionato, D Vigan\u00f2, C Yepes, A Acevedo, N Horspool, H Crowley, K Jaiswal, M Journeay, M Pittore, 2018. Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Seismic Risk Map (version 2018.1). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13117\/GEM-GLOBAL-SEISMIC-RISK-MAP-2018.1\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13117\/GEM-GLOBAL-SEISMIC-RISK-MAP-2018.1<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Zhu, J., Baise, L. G., Thompson, E. M., 2017, An Updated Geospatial Liquefaction Model for Global Application, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107, p 1365-1385, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/0.1785\/0120160198\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/0.1785\/0120160198<\/a><\/li>\n<h3>Specific References<\/h3>\n<li>Amos, C.B., Bwonlee, S.J., Hood, D.H., Fisher, G.B., B\u00fcrgmann, R., Renne, P.R., and Jayko, A.S.,  2013. Chronology of tectonic, geomorphic, and volcanic interactions and the tempo of fault slip near Little Lake, California in GSA Bulletin, v. 125, no. 7-8, <a href=\"http:\/\/10.1130\/B30803.1\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/B30803.1<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Astiz, L. and Allen, C.R., 1983. Seismicity of the Garlock Fault, California in BSSA v. 73, no. 6, p. 1721-1734<\/li>\n<li>Bacon, S.N. and Pezzopane, S.K., 2007. A 25,000-year record of earthquakes on the Owens Valley fault near Lone Pine, California: Implications for recurrence intervals, slip rates, and segmentation models in GSA Bulletin, v. 119, no. 7\/8, p. 823-847, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/B25879.1\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/B25879.1<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Bacon, S.N., Bullard, T.F., Keen-Zebert, A.K., Jayko, A.S., and Decker, D.L., 2019. Spatiotemporal patterns of distributed slip in southern Owens Valley indicated by deformation of late Pleistocene shorelines, eastern California  in GSA Bulletin, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/B35247.1\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/B35247.1<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Bason, S.N., Jaylo, A.S., Owen, L.A., Lindvall, S.C., Rhodes, E.J., Shumer, R.A., and Decker, D.L., 2010. A 50,000-year record of lake-level variations and overflow from Owens Lake, eastern California, USA in Quaternary Science Reviews, v. 238, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quascirev.2020.106312\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.quascirev.2020.106312<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Bakun, W.H., Ralph A. Haugerud, Margaret G. Hopper, Ruth S. Ludwin, 2002. The December 1872 Washington State Earthquake in BSSA, v. 92, no. 8., <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1785\/0120010274\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1785\/0120010274<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Brocher, T., Margaret G. Hopper, S.T. Ted Algermissen, David M. Perkins, Stanley R. Brockman, and Edouard P. Arnold, 2048. Aftershocks, Earthquake Effects, and the Location of the Large 14 December 1872 Earthquake near Entiat, Central Washington in BSSA, v. 108, no. 1., <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1785\/0120170224\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1785\/0120170224<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Chuang, R.Y. and Johnson, K.M., 2011. Reconciling geologic and geodetic model fault slip-rate discrepancies in Southern California: Consideration of nonsteady mantle flow and lower crustal fault creep in Geology, v. 39, no. 7, p. 627630, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/G32120.1\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/G32120.1<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Dawson, T. E., S. F. McGill, and T. K. Rockwell, Irregular recurrence of paleoearthquakes along the central Garlock fault near El Paso Peaks, California, J. Geophys. Res., 108(B7), 2356, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2001JB001744\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2001JB001744<\/a>, 2003.<\/li>\n<li>Dixon, T.H., Norabuena, E., and Hotaling, L., 2003. Paleoseismology and Global Positioning System: Earthquake-cycle effects and geodetic versus geologic fault slip rates in the Eastern California shear zone in Geology, v. 31, no. 1., p. 55-58, <\/li>\n<li>Frankel, K.L., Glazner, A.F., Kirby, E., Monastero, F.C., Strane, M.D., Oskin, M.E., Unruh, J.R., Walker, J.D., Anandakrishnan, S., Bartley, J.M., Coleman, D.S., Dolan, J.F., Finkel, R.C., Greene, D., Kylander-Clark, A., Morrero, S., Owen, L.A., and Phillips, F., 2008, Active tectonics of the eastern California shear zone, in Duebendorfer, E.M., and Smith, E.I., eds., Field Guide to Plutons, Volcanoes, Faults, Reefs, Dinosaurs, and Possible Glaciation in Selected Areas of Arizona, California, and Nevada: Geological Society of America Field Guide 11, p. 43\u201381, doi: 10.1130\/2008.fl d011(03).<\/li>\n<li>Frankel, K.L., Glazner, A.F., Kirby, E., Monastero, F.C., Strane, M.D., Oskin, M.E., Unruh, J.R., Walker, J.D., Anandakrishnan, S., Bartley, J.M., Coleman, D.S., Dolan, J.F., Finkel, R.C., Greene, D., Kylander-Clark, A., Morrero, S., Owen, L.A., and Phillips, F., 2008, Active tectonics of the eastern California shear zone, in Duebendorfer, E.M., and Smith, E.I., eds., Field Guide to Plutons, Volcanoes, Faults, Reefs, Dinosaurs, and Possible Glaciation in Selected Areas of Arizona, California, and Nevada: Geological Society of America Field Guide 11, p. 43\u201381, doi: 10.1130\/2008.fl d011(03).<\/li>\n<li>Gan, W., Zhang, P., Shen, Z-K., Prescott, W.H., and Svarc, J.L., 2003. Initiation of deformation of the Eastern California Shear Zone: Constraints from Garlock fault geometry and GPS observations in GRL, v. 30, no. 10, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2003GL017090\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2003GL017090<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Guest, B., Pavlis, T.L., Goldberg, H., and Serpa, L., 2003. Chasing the Garlock: A study of tectonic response to vertical axis rotation in Geology, v. 31, no. 6, p. 553-556<\/li>\n<li>Haddon, Elizabeth K.; Amos, Colin B.; Zielke, O.; Jayko, A. S.; and B\u00fcrgmann, R., &#8220;Surface Slip During Large Owens Valley Fault Earthquakes&#8221; (2016). Geology Faculty Publications. 99. <a href=\"https:\/\/cedar.wwu.edu\/geology_facpubs\/99\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/cedar.wwu.edu\/geology_facpubs\/99<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Kylander-Clark, A.R.C., Coleman, D.S., Glazner, A.F., and Bartley, J.M., 2005. Evidence for 65 km of dextral slip across Owens Valley, California, since 83 Ma in GSA Bulletin, v. 117, no. 7\/8, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/B25624.1\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/B25624.1<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Oskin, M. and Iriondo, A., 2004. Large-magnitude transient strain accumulation on the Blackwater fault, Eastern California shear zone in Geology, v. 32, no. 4, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/G20223.1\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/G20223.1<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Oskin, M., L. Perg, D. Blumentritt, S. Mukhopadhyay, and A. Iriondo, 2007. Slip rate of the Calico fault: Implications for geologic versus geodetic rate discrepancy in the Eastern California Shear Zone, J. Geophys. Res., v. 112, B03402, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2006JB004451\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2006JB004451<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Oskin, M., Perg, L., Shelef, E., Strane, M., Gurney, E., Singer, B., and Zhang, X., 2008. Elevated shear zone loading rate during an earthquake cluster in eastern California in Geology, v. 36, no. 6, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/G24814A.1\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1130\/G24814A.1<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Peltzer, G., Crampe, F., Hensely, S., and Rosen, P., 2001. Transient strain accumulation and fault interaction in the Eastern California shear zone in geology, v. 29, no. 11<\/li>\n<li>Petersen, M.D. and Wesnousky, S.G.,  1994. Review Fault Slip Rates and Earthquake Histories for Active Faults in Southern California in BSSA, v. 84, no. 5, p. 1608-1649<\/li>\n<li>Stein, R.S., Earthquake Conversations, Scientific American, vol. 288, 72-79, January issue, 2003. Republished in: Our Ever Changing Earth, Scientific American, Special Edition, v. 15 (2), 82-89, 2005.<\/li>\n<li>Toda, S., Stein, R. S., Richards-Dinger, K. &#038; Bozkurt, S. Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California: Animations built on earthquake stress transfer. J. Geophys. Res. 110, B05S16 (2005) <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2004JB003415\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2004JB003415<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><font color=\"orange\"><strong>Return to the <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=3218\">Earthquake Reports page<\/a>.<\/font><\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Sorted by <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=3219\">Magnitude<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Sorted by <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=3220\">Year<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Sorted by <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=9351\">Day of the Year<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Sorted By <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=3226\">Region<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!-- time to complete: 6.25 hours -- 10:00 - 16:15--><br \/>\n<!--\n\u00b0\n\u2265\n\u00d1\n\u00f6\n\u00e1\n\u00b1\n\n\n<ul>\n\t\n\n<li><\/li>\n\n\n\n\n<blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n\n<ul>\n\t\n\n<li><\/li>\n\n\n<a href=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a>\n\n\n<blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry-summary\">\nWell, the east side of the Sierra lives up to its reputation for being in earthquake country. From the July 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence (reports here)to some shakers east of Mono Lake, to the May 2020 Monte Cristo Earthquake Sequence&hellip;\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=9580\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &ldquo;Earthquake Report: Owens Valley, CA&rdquo;<\/span>&hellip;<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":9581,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[5,6,7,27,31,33],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/20200624_lone_pine_interpretation-1-scaled.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9580"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9580"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9580\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11145,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9580\/revisions\/11145"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/9581"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9580"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9580"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}