{"id":11611,"date":"2023-12-02T23:28:56","date_gmt":"2023-12-02T23:28:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=11611"},"modified":"2023-12-30T21:22:50","modified_gmt":"2023-12-30T21:22:50","slug":"earthquake-report-m-7-6-offshore-of-the-philippines","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=11611","title":{"rendered":"Earthquake Report: M 7.6 offshore of the Philippines"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This morning (my time) I was awakened by the tsunami notification that I get on my phone. I lept into action.<\/p>\n<p>I get tsunami notifications so that I can respond to these potential tsunami events that may impact the coast of California as part of my job at the <a href=\"http:\/\/tsunami.ca.gov\/\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">California Geological Survey<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>There was a M 7.6 earthquake offshore of the island of Mindanao, Philippines. And, it was close to land (so a good chance that there may be casualties and damage). <\/p>\n<p>I immediately thought of the people who live or visit there and what they must be experiencing. It is frightening to experience such a large magnitude earthquake.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/earthquake.usgs.gov\/earthquakes\/eventpage\/us7000lff4\/executive\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/earthquake.usgs.gov\/earthquakes\/eventpage\/us7000lff4\/executive<\/a><\/p>\n<p>This part of the world is tectonically complicated. The nation of Philippines is bordered by convergent plate boundaries called subduction zones. <\/p>\n<p>Subduction zones are where plates move towards each other. One of the plates dives down beneath the other plate. The interface of these plates is called the megathrust subduction zone earthquake fault.<\/p>\n<p>To the east of the Philippines is the Philippines trench, a an area of very deep water formed by the subduction zone there where the Philippine Sea plate subducts beneath the Sunda plate (part of Eurasia). To the west is the Manila trench, where the Sunda plate subducts eastwards beneath the Philippine Sea plate. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Initially<\/strong>, it appeared that this earthquake may be a megathrust interface earthquake. However, the earthquake was too shallow to be on the subduction zone. The M 7.6 was actually somewhere in the upper plate.<\/p>\n<p>However, there have been quite productive series of aftershocks and triggered earthquakes. Most of these earthquakes are not really aftershocks, since they are on different faults. The largest magnitude earthquakes, other than the M 7.6, appear related to the megathrust (e.g., the M 6.4 and M 6.9).<\/p>\n<p>In fact, it appears that the M 7.6 has very few aftershocks. Most of the seismicity following the M 7.6 appear to be related to the megathrust triggered events.<\/p>\n<p>Given the depth of the earthquake, if there was to be a tsunami, it would probably be a smaller one.<\/p>\n<p>That is what came to be true. There is a tide gage near Davao City, in a location sheltered from a direct path from the M 7.4 epicenter (mapped location of the earthquake). <\/p>\n<p>The tsunami is evident in these tide gage data. I plot these data below:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20231202_philippines\/20231202_philippines_tide_gage_plot_davao.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20231202_philippines\/20231202_philippines_tide_gage_plot_davao.jpg\" width=\"100% alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>UPDATE: 4 Dec 2023<\/p>\n<p>Above I write that the M 7.6 was likely on a thrust fault in the upper plate. This is based on the hypocentral (3-dimensional location of the earthquake) location relative to the USGS model of the subduction zone (&#8220;slab 2.0&#8221;). <\/p>\n<p>We may think about &#8220;splay faults,&#8221; faults that begin at depth along the megathrust, but split off as separate faults and, possibly, reach the surface of the seafloor.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Judith Hubbard proposed an alternate hypothesis (see their tweet in the social media section below). The USGS slab 2.0 model may be too deep here. This is entirely possible, if not likely. <\/p>\n<p>If Hubbard&#8217;s hypothesis is correct, it would place the abundance of the sequence on faults within the subducting plate. <\/p>\n<p>This is also possible. However, I would have expected that the majority of these earthquakes would be along the megathrust, not within one of the plates.<\/p>\n<p><H2><font color=\"orange\">Below is my interpretive poster for this earthquake<\/font><\/H2><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>I plot the seismicity from the past month, with diameter representing magnitude (see legend). I include earthquake epicenters from 1922-2022 with magnitudes M \u2265 3.0 in one version. <\/li>\n<li>I plot the USGS fault plane solutions (moment tensors in blue and focal mechanisms in orange), possibly in addition to some relevant historic earthquakes. <\/li>\n<li>A review of the basic base map variations and data that I use for the interpretive posters can be found on the <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=3218\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Earthquake Reports page<\/a>. I have improved these posters over time and some of this background information applies to the older posters.<\/li>\n<li>Some basic fundamentals of earthquake geology and plate tectonics can be found on the <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=8202\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Earthquake Plate Tectonic Fundamentals page<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<H3><font color=\"orange\">I include some inset figures. Some of the same figures are located in different places on the larger scale map below.<\/font><\/H3><\/p>\n<li>In the upper left corner is a map showing the plate tectonic boundaries (from the GEM).<\/li>\n<li>Below the tectonic map is a low angle oblique view of the plate boundaries showing the subsurface geometry of the subduction zones (Hall, 2011). I placed an orange star in the location of the M 7.6.<\/li>\n<li>In the lower right corner is a map that shows the M 7.4 earthquake intensity using the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usgs.gov\/programs\/earthquake-hazards\/modified-mercalli-intensity-scale#:~:text=The%20effect%20of%20an%20earthquake,%2C%20and%20finally%20%2D%20total%20destruction.\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">modified Mercalli intensity scale<\/a>. Earthquake intensity is a measure of how strongly the Earth shakes during an earthquake, so gets smaller the further away one is from the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Epicenter\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">earthquake epicenter<\/a>. The map colors represent a model of what the intensity may be. The USGS has a system called &#8220;Did You Feel It?&#8221; (DYFI) where people enter their observations from the earthquake and the USGS calculates what the intensity was for that person. The dots with yellow labels show what people actually felt in those different locations.<\/li>\n<li>In the lower left center is a plot that shows the same intensity (both modeled and reported) data as displayed on the map. Note how the intensity gets smaller with distance from the earthquake.<\/li>\n<li>In the upper right corner are two maps showing the possibility of earthquake induced liquefaction for these two earthquakes.<\/li>\n<li>To the left of the ground failure maps is a plot of the tide gage data from Davao.<\/li>\n<li>Above the intensity plot is the USGS fault slip model for this M 7.4 earthquake.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is the map with a month&#8217;s seismicity plotted.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20231202_philippines\/20231202_philippines_interpretation.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20231202_philippines\/20231202_philippines_interpretation.jpg\" width=\"100% alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<H2><strong><font color=\"orange\">Some Relevant Discussion and Figures<\/font><\/strong><\/H2><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is a map that shows a simplified version of the subduction zones in the region (Galgana et al., 2007).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20181229_philippines\/galgana_etal_2007_deformation_philippines_geodetic_observations_fig_01.png\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20181229_philippines\/galgana_etal_2007_deformation_philippines_geodetic_observations_fig_01.png\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nPhysical map of the Philippines, showing topography and bathymetry. The two opposing subduction zones (the Manila Trench and the Philippine Trench\/East Luzon Trough), major plates (SUND and PHSP) and the major Philippine Fault System with splays in Luzon (yellow lines) are mapped (basemap derived from the UNAVCO Jules Verne Navigator).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>This is the low-angle oblique view of the region (Hall, 2011).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/F19.large.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/F19.large.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n3D cartoon of plate boundaries in the Molucca Sea region modified from Hall et al. (1995). Although seismicity identifies a number of plates there are no continuous boundaries, and the Cotobato, North Sulawesi and Philippine Trenches are all intraplate features. The apparent distinction between different crust types, such as Australian continental crust and oceanic crust of the Philippine and Molucca Sea, is partly a boundary inactive since the Early Miocene (east Sulawesi) and partly a younger but now probably inactive boundary of the Sorong Fault. The upper  crust of this entire region is deforming in a much more continuous way than suggested by this cartoon.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>This is smaller scale tectonic map of the region (Zahirovic et al., 2014).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170428_philippines\/Zahirovic_etal_2014_The_Cretaceous_and_Cenozoic_tectonic_evolution_of_Southeast_Asia_fig_01_A.JPG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170428_philippines\/Zahirovic_etal_2014_The_Cretaceous_and_Cenozoic_tectonic_evolution_of_Southeast_Asia_fig_01_A.JPG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nRegional tectonic setting with plate boundaries (MORs\/transforms = black, subduction zones = teethed red) from Bird (2003) and ophiolite belts representing sutures modified from Hutchison (1975) and Baldwin et al. (2012). West Sulawesi basalts are from Polv\u00e9 et al. (1997), fracture zones are from Matthews et al. (2011) and basin outlines are from Hearn et al. (2003). ANI \u2013 Andaman and Nicobar Islands, BD\u2013 Billiton Depression, Ba \u2013 Bangka Island, BI \u2013 Belitung (Billiton) Island, BiS \u2013 Bismarck Sea, BP \u2013 Benham Plateau, CaR \u2013 Caroline Ridge, CS \u2013 Celebes Sea, DG\u2013 Dangerous Grounds, EauR \u2013 Eauripik Ridge, FIN \u2013 Finisterre Terrane, GoT \u2013 Gulf of Thailand, GR\u2013 Gagua Ridge, HAL\u2013 Halmahera, HBa \u2013 Huatung Basin, KB\u2013Ketungau Basin, KP \u2013 Khorat Platform, KT \u2013 Kiilsgaard Trough, LS \u2013 Luconia Shoals, MacB \u2013 Macclesfield Bank, ManTr \u2013 Manus Trench, MaTr \u2013 Mariana Trench, MB\u2013 Melawi Basin, MDB\u2013 Minami Daito Basin, MG\u2013 Mangkalihat, MIN \u2013 Mindoro, MN\u2013 Mawgyi Nappe, MoS \u2013 Molucca Sea, MS\u2013 Makassar Straits, MTr \u2013 Mussau Trench, NGTr \u2013 New Guinea Trench, NI \u2013 Natuna Islands, ODR\u2013 Oki Daito Ridge, OJP \u2013Ontong Java Plateau, OSF \u2013 Owen Stanley Fault, PAL \u2013 Palawan, PhF \u2013 Philippine Fault, PT \u2013 Paternoster Platform, PTr \u2013 Palau Trench, PVB \u2013 Parece Vela Basin, RB \u2013 Reed Bank, RMF\u2013 Ramu-Markham Fault, RRF \u2013 Red River fault, SEM\u2013 Semitau, ShB \u2013 Shikoku Basin, Sol. Sea \u2013 Solomon Sea, SPK \u2013 Sepik, SPT \u2013 abah\u2013Palawan Trough, STr \u2013 Sorol Trough, Sul \u2013 Sulawesi, SuS \u2013 Sulu Sea, TPAA\u2013 Torricelli\u2013Prince Alexander Arc, WB\u2013West Burma, WCT\u2013W Caroline Trough, YTr \u2013Yap Trough.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>This is a map and series of cross sections showing subducting plates in blue (Zahirovic et al., 2014). The cross sections are based upon seismic wave tomography, which is similar to CT scans (Computed Tomography of X-Rays). These two processes use the same general methods to investigate the 3-dimensional views of internal structures (bodies vs. the Earth). More can be found in their paper, but basically, the blue regions represent areas that have higher seismic velocity. Oceanic lithosphere has higher seismic velocities than the surrounding mantle. So, the subducting oceanic slabs show up as blue. The corss section G-G&#8217; is at about the same latitude as the M = 7.0 earthquake. Note that the Philippine sea plate subducting at the Philippine trench (dipping to the west\/left) is evident, while the slab associated with the Cotobato trench does not appear visible. Compare this with the seismicity cross section from Smoczyck et al. (2013), where the Cotobato trench seismicity is much more shallow than the Philippine trench.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170428_philippines\/Zahirovic_etal_2014_The_Cretaceous_and_Cenozoic_tectonic_evolution_of_Southeast_Asia_fig_10.JPG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170428_philippines\/Zahirovic_etal_2014_The_Cretaceous_and_Cenozoic_tectonic_evolution_of_Southeast_Asia_fig_10.JPG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nVertical sections from MIT-P (Li et al., 2008) and GyPSuM-S (Simmons et al., 2009) seismic tomography models along profiles A to E (magenta lines). The first-order differences between the P- and S-wave models is that the amplitude of the positive seismic velocity anomalies significantly diminishes away from continental coverage (e.g., dashed lines in profiles A and B). A depth slice at 746 km from MIT-P isprovided for reference with super-imposed present-day coastlines and plate boundaries. Interpreted slab sources are labeled: GI-BA= Greater India\u2013Neo-Tethyan back-arc slab, M\/N-T \u2013 Meso- and Neo-Tethyan slabs, W-S \u2013Woyla\u2013Sunda slabs, S \u2013 Sunda slab, PSCS \u2013 proto-South China Sea slab, PAC \u2013 Pacific slab, PMOL\u2013 proto-Molucca slab, PSOL \u2013 proto-Solomon slab, CS \u2013 Caroline slab, PSP \u2013 Philippine Sea Plate slab, S-C = Sulu\u2013Celebes slabs.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>However, here is a figure that shows isosurfaces from their tomography models (Zahirovic et al., 2014). This shows what may be slabs related to the Cotobato trench (western part of G-G&#8217; cross section). These slabs show up better on the lower figure.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170428_philippines\/Zahirovic_etal_2014_The_Cretaceous_and_Cenozoic_tectonic_evolution_of_Southeast_Asia_fig_09.JPG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170428_philippines\/Zahirovic_etal_2014_The_Cretaceous_and_Cenozoic_tectonic_evolution_of_Southeast_Asia_fig_09.JPG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n3-D visualization of +0.2% seismic velocity anomaly isosurfaces in MIT-P (top) and +0.9% seismic velocity perturbation in GyPSuM-S (bottom) models. Profiles A to G represent the vertical profiles (see Fig. 10) that capture the convergence and subduction histories of the region since the Cretaceous. Present-day coastlines are translucent grey shades, and present-day plate boundaries are translucent black lines. Slab volumes are colored by their depth, while the light blue color represents the interior surface of these slabs. PSCS \u2013 proto-South China Sea slab.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>The USGS Maps and Cross-Sections<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is the map from Smocyk et al., 2013, followed by the legend. The entire poster is <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a> (92 MB pdf).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_phillipines.PNG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_phillipines.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_phillipines_map_legend.PNG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_phillipines_map_legend.PNG\"  alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<li>Below are two cross sections that show the subduction zone seismicity, followed by the legend. The location of these cross sections are labeled on the map above.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_phillipines_XSEC_CC.PNG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_phillipines_XSEC_CC.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_phillipines_XSEC_DD.PNG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_phillipines_XSEC_DD.PNG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_phillipines_XSEC_legend.PNG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_phillipines_XSEC_legend.PNG\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<li>This map shows the seismic hazard for this region. The color represents the likelihood of any region experiencing ground shaking of a particular magnitude. The scale is &#8220;Peak Ground Acceleration.&#8221; Units are m\/s^2. Purple represents gravitational acceleration of 1 g, gravity at Earth&#8217;s surface. <\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_seismic_hazard.JPG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170408_phillipines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate_seismic_hazard.JPG\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a>\n<\/ul>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><strong><font color=\"orange\">Shaking Intensity<\/font><\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Here is a figure that shows a more detailed comparison between the modeled intensity and the reported intensity. Both data use the same color scale, the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale (MMI). <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=3218\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">More about this can be found here<\/a>. The colors and contours on the map are results from the USGS modeled intensity. The DYFI data are plotted as colored dots (color = MMI, diameter = number of reports).<\/li>\n<li>In the upper panel is the USGS Did You Feel It reports map, showing reports as colored dots using the MMI color scale. Underlain on this map are colored areas showing the USGS modeled estimate for shaking intensity (MMI scale).<\/li>\n<li>In the lower panel is a plot showing MMI intensity (vertical axis) relative to distance from the earthquake (horizontal axis). The models are represented by the green and orange lines. The DYFI data are plotted as light blue dots. The mean and median (different types of &#8220;average&#8221;) are plotted as orange and purple dots. Note how well the reports fit the green line (the model that represents how MMI works based on quakes in California).<\/li>\n<li>Below the map and the lower plot is the USGS MMI Intensity scale, which lists the level of damage for each level of intensity, along with approximate measures of how strongly the ground shakes at these intensities, showing levels in acceleration (Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA) and velocity (Peak Ground Velocity, PGV).<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20231202_philippines\/20231202_philippines_intensity_interpretation.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20231202_philippines\/20231202_philippines_intensity_interpretation.jpg\" width=\"100% alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><strong><font color=\"orange\">Seismic Hazard and Seismic Risk<\/font><\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>These are the two maps shown in the map above, the <a href=\"https:\/\/maps.openquake.org\/map\/global-seismic-hazard-map\/#2\/24.7\/-18.6\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">GEM Seismic Hazard<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/maps.openquake.org\/map\/global-seismic-risk-map\/#6\/1.454\/125.451\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">GEM Seismic Risk<\/a> maps from Pagani et al. (2018) and Silva et al. (2018).<\/li>\n<ul>\n<h2>\n<li>The GEM Seismic Hazard Map:<\/li>\n<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190714_halmahera\/gem_global_seismic_hazard_map_v2018.1.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190714_halmahera\/gem_global_seismic_hazard_map_v2018.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190714_halmahera\/GEM_hazard_legend.png\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190714_halmahera\/GEM_hazard_legend.png\" width=\"50%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<li>The Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Global Seismic Hazard Map (version 2018.1) depicts the geographic distribution of the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) with a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50 years, computed for reference rock conditions (shear wave velocity, VS30, of 760-800 m\/s). The map was created by collating maps computed using national and regional probabilistic seismic hazard models developed by various institutions and projects, and by GEM Foundation scientists. The OpenQuake engine, an open-source seismic hazard and risk calculation software developed principally by the GEM Foundation, was used to calculate the hazard values. A smoothing methodology was applied to homogenise hazard values along the model borders. The map is based on a database of hazard models described using the OpenQuake engine data format (NRML). Due to possible model limitations, regions portrayed with low hazard may still experience potentially damaging earthquakes. <\/li>\n<li>Here is a view of the GEM seismic hazard map for Indonesia and the Philippines.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200506_indonesia\/GEM_seismic_hazard_indonesia_with_legend.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200506_indonesia\/GEM_seismic_hazard_indonesia_with_legend.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<h2>\n<li>The GEM Seismic Risk Map:<\/li>\n<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190714_halmahera\/gem_global_seismic_risk_map_v2018.1.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190714_halmahera\/gem_global_seismic_risk_map_v2018.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190714_halmahera\/GEM_risk_legend.png\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20190714_halmahera\/GEM_risk_legend.png\" width=\"50%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<li>The Global Seismic Risk Map (v2018.1) presents the geographic distribution of average annual loss (USD) normalised by the average construction costs of the respective country (USD\/m2) due to ground shaking in the residential, commercial and industrial building stock, considering contents, structural and non-structural components. The normalised metric allows a direct comparison of the risk between countries with widely different construction costs. It does not consider the effects of tsunamis, liquefaction, landslides, and fires following earthquakes. The loss estimates are from direct physical damage to buildings due to shaking, and thus damage to infrastructure or indirect losses due to business interruption are not included. The average annual losses are presented on a hexagonal grid, with a spacing of 0.30 x 0.34 decimal degrees (approximately 1,000 km<sup>2<\/sup> at the equator). The average annual losses were computed using the event-based calculator of the OpenQuake engine, an open-source software for seismic hazard and risk analysis developed by the GEM Foundation. The seismic hazard, exposure and vulnerability models employed in these calculations were provided by national institutions, or developed within the scope of regional programs or bilateral collaborations. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<li>Here is a view of the GEM seismic risk map for Indonesia and the Philippines.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200506_indonesia\/GEM_seismic_risk_indonesia_with_legend.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20200506_indonesia\/GEM_seismic_risk_indonesia_with_legend.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><strong><font color=\"orange\">Potential for Ground Failure<\/font><\/strong><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Below are a series of maps that show the potential for landslides and liquefaction. These are all USGS data products.<br \/>\nThere are many different ways in which a landslide can be triggered. The first order relations behind slope failure (landslides) is that the \u201cresisting\u201d forces that are preventing slope failure (e.g. the strength of the bedrock or soil) are overcome by the \u201cdriving\u201d forces that are pushing this land downwards (e.g. gravity). The ratio of resisting forces to driving forces is called the Factor of Safety (FOS). We can write this ratio like this:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>FOS = Resisting Force \/ Driving Force<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>When FOS &gt; 1, the slope is stable and when FOS &lt; 1, the slope fails and we get a landslide. The illustration below shows these relations. Note how the slope angle \u03b1 can take part in this ratio (the steeper the slope, the greater impact of the mass of the slope can contribute to driving forces). The real world is more complicated than the simplified illustration below.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20180928_indonesia\/force_balance_landscape.jpg\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20180928_indonesia\/force_balance_landscape.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<li>Landslide ground shaking can change the Factor of Safety in several ways that might increase the driving force or decrease the resisting force. Keefer (1984) studied a global data set of earthquake triggered landslides and found that larger earthquakes trigger larger and more numerous landslides across a larger area than do smaller earthquakes. Earthquakes can cause landslides because the seismic waves can cause the driving force to increase (the earthquake motions can \u201cpush\u201d the land downwards), leading to a landslide. In addition, ground shaking can change the strength of these earth materials (a form of resisting force) with a process called liquefaction.<\/li>\n<li>Sediment or soil strength is based upon the ability for sediment particles to push against each other without moving. This is a combination of friction and the forces exerted between these particles. This is loosely what we call the \u201cangle of internal friction.\u201d Liquefaction is a process by which pore pressure increases cause water to push out against the sediment particles so that they are no longer touching.<\/li>\n<li>An analogy that some may be familiar with relates to a visit to the beach. When one is walking on the wet sand near the shoreline, the sand may hold the weight of our body generally pretty well. However, if we stop and vibrate our feet back and forth, this causes pore pressure to increase and we sink into the sand as the sand liquefies. Or, at least our feet sink into the sand.<\/li>\n<li>Below is a diagram showing how an increase in pore pressure can push against the sediment particles so that they are not touching any more. This allows the particles to move around and this is why our feet sink in the sand in the analogy above. This is also what changes the strength of earth materials such that a landslide can be triggered.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20180928_indonesia\/liquefaction_pore_pressure_change_patton.jpg\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20180928_indonesia\/liquefaction_pore_pressure_change_patton.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<li>Below is a diagram based upon a publication designed to educate the public about landslides and the processes that trigger them (USGS, 2004). Additional background information about landslide types can be found in Highland et al. (2008). There was a variety of landslide types that can be observed surrounding the earthquake region. So, this illustration can help people when they observing the landscape response to the earthquake whether they are using aerial imagery, photos in newspaper or website articles, or videos on social media. Will you be able to locate a landslide scarp or the toe of a landslide? This figure shows a rotational landslide, one where the land rotates along a curvilinear failure surface.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20180928_indonesia\/landslide_terminology_patton.jpg\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20180928_indonesia\/landslide_terminology_patton.jpg\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<li>Below is the liquefaction susceptibility and landslide probability map (Jessee et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2017). Please head over to <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8656\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">that report<\/a> for more information about the USGS Ground Failure products (landslides and liquefaction). Basically, earthquakes shake the ground and this ground shaking can cause landslides. <\/li>\n<li>I use the same color scheme that the USGS uses on their website. Note how the areas that are more likely to have experienced earthquake induced liquefaction are in the valleys. <a href=\"https:\/\/earthquake.usgs.gov\/data\/ground-failure\/background.php\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Learn more about how the USGS prepares these model results here<\/a>.<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20231202_philippines\/20231202_philippines_ground_failure_interpretation.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20231202_philippines\/20231202_philippines_ground_failure_interpretation.jpg\" width=\"100% alt=\"\" \/><\/a>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<h2> <strong><font color=orange>Philippines | Western Pacific<\/font><\/strong> <\/h2>\n<h3>Earthquake Reports<\/h3>\n<li>2023.12.02 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=11611\">M 7.6 Philippines<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2022.07.27 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=10210\">M 7.0 Philippines<\/a> (poster)<\/li>\n<li>2021.08.11 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=9968\">M 7.1 Philippines<\/a> (poster)<\/li>\n<li>2019.11.14 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=9106\">M 7.1 Halmahera<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2019.07.14 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8781\">M 7.3 Halmahera<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2018.12.29 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=8086\">M 7.0 Philippines<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2017.12.08 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=5997\">M 6.5 Caroline Ridge<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2017.12.09 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=6012\">M 6.5 Caroline Ridge<\/a> Update #1<\/li>\n<li>2017.08.11 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=5719\">M 6.2 Philippines<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2017.04.28 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=5337\">M 6.9 Philippines<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2017.04.08 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=5255\">M 5.9 Philippines<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2017.01.10 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=4926\">M 7.3 Celebes Sea<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2016.07.29 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=4716\">M 7.7 Mariana<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2015.03.17 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=2267\">M 6.2 Molucca Sea<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2014.11.26 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=2051\">M 6.8 Molucca Sea<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2014.11.21 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=2040\">M 6.5 Molucca Sea<\/a><\/li>\n<li>2014.11.15 <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=2035\">M 7.1 Molucca Sea<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<p><H2><strong><font color=\"orange\">Social Media<\/font><\/strong><\/H2><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/EarthquakeReport?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#EarthquakeReport<\/a> for M7.6 <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Lindol?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Lindol<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Earthquake<\/a> offshore of <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Philippines?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Philippines<\/a> <\/p>\n<p>Widely felt<br \/>Reported intensity MMI 7 so far<br \/>Probably will generate tsunami <\/p>\n<p>2018 report has tectonic background information <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/wr5A0HdqI1\">https:\/\/t.co\/wr5A0HdqI1<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/tAksqwTFvd\">https:\/\/t.co\/tAksqwTFvd<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/P3CZomI9F6\">pic.twitter.com\/P3CZomI9F6<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jason &quot;Jay&quot; R. Patton (@patton_cascadia) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/patton_cascadia\/status\/1730966568065290282?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/EarthquakeReport?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#EarthquakeReport<\/a> for M7.6 <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Lindol?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Lindol<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Earthquake<\/a> offshore of <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Philippines?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Philippines<\/a> <\/p>\n<p>Pacific Tsunami Warning Center notification <br \/>Probably will generate tsunami in regions listed <\/p>\n<p>2018 report has tectonic background information <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/wr5A0HdqI1\">https:\/\/t.co\/wr5A0HdqI1<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/gMQt8te0ae\">https:\/\/t.co\/gMQt8te0ae<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/k4gCqXCMNz\">pic.twitter.com\/k4gCqXCMNz<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jason &quot;Jay&quot; R. Patton (@patton_cascadia) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/patton_cascadia\/status\/1730977512426246154?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/EarthquakeReport?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#EarthquakeReport<\/a> for M7.6 <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Lindol?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Lindol<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Earthquake<\/a> offshore of the <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Philippines?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Philippines<\/a><\/p>\n<p>generated ~10cm amplitude (20cm wave height) tsunami at Davao Tide Gage (which is in a somewhat sheltered location compared to epicenter so probably larger tsunami along coast)<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/gVDP4iJO55\">https:\/\/t.co\/gVDP4iJO55<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/Dm4DdbxpYe\">pic.twitter.com\/Dm4DdbxpYe<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jason &quot;Jay&quot; R. Patton (@patton_cascadia) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/patton_cascadia\/status\/1731021598495572383?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/EarthquakeReport?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#EarthquakeReport<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/TsunamiReport?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#TsunamiReport<\/a> for M 7.4 <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Lindol?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Lindol<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Earthquake<\/a> offshore of <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Mindanao?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Mindanao<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Philippines?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Philippines<\/a><\/p>\n<p>compressional (thrust) earthquake<br \/>generated tsunami<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/USGS_Quakes?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@USGS_Quakes<\/a> models suggest high chance for liquefaction<br \/>triggered slip near interface (?)<\/p>\n<p>report here:<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/CVr22I6vTa\">https:\/\/t.co\/CVr22I6vTa<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/WLJw0BLJKv\">pic.twitter.com\/WLJw0BLJKv<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jason &quot;Jay&quot; R. Patton (@patton_cascadia) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/patton_cascadia\/status\/1731108924642971717?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 3, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Information Statement Tsunami Info Stmt: M7.7 Mindanao, Philippine Islands 0637PST Dec 2: Tsunami NOT expected<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; NWS Tsunami Alerts (@NWS_NTWC) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/NWS_NTWC\/status\/1730963200961904764?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"vi\" dir=\"ltr\">M 7.6 &#8211; Mindanao, Philippines<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/7lON8jKAk6\">https:\/\/t.co\/7lON8jKAk6<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/ZUvRWAitWE\">pic.twitter.com\/ZUvRWAitWE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Wendy Bohon, PhD \ud83c\udf0f (@DrWendyRocks) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DrWendyRocks\/status\/1730969935055098272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Mw=7.6, MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES (Depth: 32 km), 2023\/12\/02 14:37:03 UTC &#8211; Full details here: <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/pzEI19fPy5\">https:\/\/t.co\/pzEI19fPy5<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/r4Qgy4i3rP\">pic.twitter.com\/r4Qgy4i3rP<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Earthquakes (@geoscope_ipgp) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/geoscope_ipgp\/status\/1730969411136143548?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Waves from the M7.6 earthquake in the Philippines shown on a nearby seismic station using Station Monitor<\/p>\n<p>\u27a1\ufe0f <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/Tir0KZELXN\">https:\/\/t.co\/Tir0KZELXN<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/HFKRH3miN0\">pic.twitter.com\/HFKRH3miN0<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; EarthScope Consortium (@EarthScope_sci) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EarthScope_sci\/status\/1730966554471543121?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center is monitoring the potential for a Tsunami threat for the Republic of Palau as well as the CNMI , Yap State, and Guam due to a 7.7 magnitude earthquake at 12:37 am ChST at Minadao, Philippines. For more information, please visit our website. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/7fzoT2ppNg\">pic.twitter.com\/7fzoT2ppNg<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; NWS Guam \ud83c\uddec\ud83c\uddfa (@NWSGuam) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/NWSGuam\/status\/1730969093241720928?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Auto solution FMNEAR (G\u00e9oazur\/OCA) with regional records for the M 7.5 &#8211; MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES &#8211; 2023-12-02 14:37:08.0 UTC (Loc EMSC used to trigger inversion).<\/p>\n<p>Thanks to the seismic records by GFZ and IRIS<\/p>\n<p>Note the absence of available regional stations in the North <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/SBoYefpiBe\">pic.twitter.com\/SBoYefpiBe<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Bertrand Delouis (@BertrandDelouis) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/BertrandDelouis\/status\/1730977701450694819?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Major M7.5+, intermediate depth, vertical-up (reverse) faulting <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#earthquake<\/a> at 10cm\/y Philippine plate convergence zone. Just offshore populated region with moderate land surface shaking and significant tsunami potential. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/aqR4m0n22B\">https:\/\/t.co\/aqR4m0n22B<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/philippines?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#philippines<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/geohazards?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#geohazards<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/JWSfNiX5eb\">pic.twitter.com\/JWSfNiX5eb<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; \ud83c\udf0e Prof Ben van der Pluijm \u2692\ufe0f (@vdpluijm) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/vdpluijm\/status\/1730977882548150586?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">A 7.7 magnitude earthquake occurred at 4:37 AM HST 12\/02 in Mindanao, Philippines. There is NO tsunami threat to Hawai\u02bbi. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/I1zjgstJoJ\">pic.twitter.com\/I1zjgstJoJ<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Hawaii EMA (@Hawaii_EMA) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Hawaii_EMA\/status\/1730970242615251311?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">One hour and half ago, Mw7.5 <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#earthquake<\/a> near eastern coast of Mindanao, Philippines. Although not shallow, could be very damaging, due to magnitude and location. Felt as far as southern Luzon. <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Tsunami?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Tsunami<\/a> expected. Similar EQ in 1989.<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/suPwwcXQZH\">https:\/\/t.co\/suPwwcXQZH<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/TQm681XoBK\">https:\/\/t.co\/TQm681XoBK<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/KF4uT50YuC\">pic.twitter.com\/KF4uT50YuC<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Jos\u00e9 R. Ribeiro (@JoseRodRibeiro) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/JoseRodRibeiro\/status\/1730982408273489925?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"vi\" dir=\"ltr\">M 7.4 &#8211; Mindanao, Philippines <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/m0Htkzmx87\">pic.twitter.com\/m0Htkzmx87<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; DARYONO BMKG (@DaryonoBMKG) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DaryonoBMKG\/status\/1730982112319492439?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/TsunamiPH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#TsunamiPH<\/a><\/p>\n<p>ADVISORY: TSUNAMI WARNING<\/p>\n<p>Tsunami Information No.1<br \/>Date and Time: 02 Dec 2023 &#8211; 10:37 PM<br \/>Magnitude = 6.9<br \/>Depth = 008 kilometers<br \/>Location = 08.52\u00b0N, 126.69\u00b0E &#8211; Offshore of Surigao Del Sur<a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/YnEUN7M8Qs\">https:\/\/t.co\/YnEUN7M8Qs<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/C3Ris1BCVp\">pic.twitter.com\/C3Ris1BCVp<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; PHIVOLCS-DOST (@phivolcs_dost) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/phivolcs_dost\/status\/1730967030562791907?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Preliminary M7.7 <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Earthquake<\/a><br \/>ID: <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/rs2023xsbiqf?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#rs2023xsbiqf<\/a><br \/>Mindanao, Philippines<br \/>2023-12-02 14:37 UTC<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/raspishake?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@raspishake<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/QuakeView?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#QuakeView<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Learn more about us at <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/ojzht2DDAL\">https:\/\/t.co\/ojzht2DDAL<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8211; EVENT: <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/EGCrzKNHQX\">https:\/\/t.co\/EGCrzKNHQX<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/924Oxw1TSw\">pic.twitter.com\/924Oxw1TSw<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Raspberry Shake Earthquake Channel (@raspishakEQ) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/raspishakEQ\/status\/1730973940120441060?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">In this video you can watch the waves from the M7.6 earthquake off the coast of Mindanao, Philippines sweep across seismic stations in North America and Europe. Animations from <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EarthScope_sci?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@EarthScope_sci<\/a> can be found at <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/h74rgO7ZKf\">https:\/\/t.co\/h74rgO7ZKf<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/DqU0crRjhM\">pic.twitter.com\/DqU0crRjhM<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Wendy Bohon, PhD \ud83c\udf0f (@DrWendyRocks) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DrWendyRocks\/status\/1731059962514706525?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">On 02 Dec 2023, 10:37 PM (local time), a Mw 7.4 earthquake with a depth of 25-30 km hit Eastern Mindanao, Philippines. As of 03 Dec 2023, 4:30 am, there were already two M&gt;6 and several M&gt;5 aftershocks. The earthquake is associated with the subduction along the Philippine Trench. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/0iyMH5cMHs\">pic.twitter.com\/0iyMH5cMHs<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Deo (@deotectonics) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/deotectonics\/status\/1731062415742390738?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Since the M7.5 Philippines earthquake ~7 hrs ago, there have been ~30 aftershocks greater than M5.0, most of which can easily be seen in the data from the <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/AusQuake?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@AusQuake<\/a> seismometers in southeast Australia. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/z72xk0Bc7M\">pic.twitter.com\/z72xk0Bc7M<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Dr. Dee Ninis (@DeeNinis) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DeeNinis\/status\/1731076696206622929?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Watch the waves from the M7.6 earthquake in the Philippines roll across seismic stations in North America. (THREAD \ud83e\uddf5) <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/NJNRY0UhkQ\">pic.twitter.com\/NJNRY0UhkQ<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; EarthScope Consortium (@EarthScope_sci) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EarthScope_sci\/status\/1731045195008164167?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Recent Earthquake Teachable Moment for the M7.6 earthquake in the Philippines. <\/p>\n<p>Teachable Moments presentations capture the opportunity to bring knowledge, insight, and critical thinking to the classroom following a newsworthy earthquake.<\/p>\n<p>\u27a1\ufe0f <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/a4C3tydbsc\">https:\/\/t.co\/a4C3tydbsc<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/jyyjpVLvH4\">pic.twitter.com\/jyyjpVLvH4<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; EarthScope Consortium (@EarthScope_sci) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/EarthScope_sci\/status\/1731061520426303670?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Over the last 7 hours there have been dozens of earthquakes off the southeast coast of the Philippines. Traces are from a station in South Australia. The largest was a magnitude 7.4 on hour 14. The quake on hour 12 is a magnitude 5.8 earthquake in the Banda Sea, north of Darwin <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/yk2VEmXTTO\">pic.twitter.com\/yk2VEmXTTO<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Adam Pascale (@SeisLOLogist) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SeisLOLogist\/status\/1731072052684271808?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Mindanao Shake Map &#8211; potential to damage <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/YnXyJsAkuD\">pic.twitter.com\/YnXyJsAkuD<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; DARYONO BMKG (@DaryonoBMKG) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DaryonoBMKG\/status\/1730992512062640425?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">2023-12-02 M7.6 Mindanao, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Philippines?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Philippines<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#earthquake<\/a> recorded in <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Scotland?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Scotland<\/a> &amp; <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Stornoway?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Stornoway<\/a> + historical seismicity &amp; cross section.<\/p>\n<p>On the edge of the shadow zone from here. <\/p>\n<p>Dist.: 11450.9km<br \/>Travel Time: 14m 0.4s<br \/>Depth: 32.763km<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Python?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Python<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/raspishake?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@raspishake<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/matplotlib?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@matplotlib<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/CitizenScience?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#CitizenScience<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/btGMvb6FSy\">pic.twitter.com\/btGMvb6FSy<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Giuseppe Petricca (@gmrpetricca) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/gmrpetricca\/status\/1730983643869319595?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 2, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>UPDATE: 4 Dec 2023<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Yesterday&#39;s M7.6 earthquake in the Philippines raised high alerts, but damage has been lower than expected. Why? We think the USGS overestimated shaking due to lack of seismometers. The slab model here also seems too deep, perhaps by ~20 km. Read more on our blog; link in my bio. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/qQBcPhgxBV\">pic.twitter.com\/qQBcPhgxBV<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Dr. Judith Hubbard (@JudithGeology) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/JudithGeology\/status\/1731347925727334819?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 3, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">The seismic activity after the 2023-12-02 M7.6 Mindanao, <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Philippines?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Philippines<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/earthquake?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#earthquake<\/a>. Almost 300 detected shocks in the past 54 hours.<\/p>\n<p>The infographic shows the events&#39; area distribution with daily &amp; magnitude data.<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Python?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#Python<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/matplotlib?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@matplotlib<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/CitizenScience?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#CitizenScience<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/c4iCULVB1M\">pic.twitter.com\/c4iCULVB1M<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Giuseppe Petricca (@gmrpetricca) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/gmrpetricca\/status\/1731781964624011480?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 4, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<H2><strong><font color=\"orange\">References:<\/font><\/strong><\/H2><\/p>\n<p><H3>Basic &#038; General References<\/H3><\/p>\n<li>Frisch, W., Meschede, M., Blakey, R., 2011. Plate Tectonics, Springer-Verlag, London, 213 pp.<\/li>\n<li>Hayes, G., 2018, Slab2 &#8211; A Comprehensive Subduction Zone Geometry Model: U.S. Geological Survey data release, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5066\/F7PV6JNV\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5066\/F7PV6JNV<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Holt, W. E., C. Kreemer, A. J. Haines, L. Estey, C. Meertens, G. Blewitt, and D. Lavallee (2005), Project helps constrain continental dynamics and seismic hazards, Eos Trans. AGU, 86(41), 383\u2013387, , <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2005EO410002\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2005EO410002<\/a>. \/li>\n<li>Jessee, M.A.N., Hamburger, M. W., Allstadt, K., Wald, D. J., Robeson, S. M., Tanyas, H., et al. (2018). A global empirical model for near-real-time assessment of seismically induced landslides. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 123, 1835\u20131859. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2017JF004494\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2017JF004494<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Kreemer, C., J. Haines, W. Holt, G. Blewitt, and D. Lavallee (2000), On the determination of a global strain rate model, Geophys. J. Int., 52(10), 765\u2013770. <\/li>\n<li>Kreemer, C., W. E. Holt, and A. J. Haines (2003), An integrated global model of present-day plate motions and plate boundary deformation, Geophys. J. Int., 154(1), 8\u201334, , <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1365-246X.2003.01917.x\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1365-246X.2003.01917.x<\/a>. <\/li>\n<li>Kreemer, C., G. Blewitt, E.C. Klein, 2014. A geodetic plate motion and Global Strain Rate Model in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, v. 15, p. 3849-3889, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/2014GC005407\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/2014GC005407<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Meyer, B., Saltus, R., Chulliat, a., 2017. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ngdc.noaa.gov\/geomag\/emag2.html\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">EMAG2: Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid (2-arc-minute resolution) Version <\/a>3. National Centers for Environmental Information, NOAA. Model. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7289\/V5H70CVX\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7289\/V5H70CVX<\/a><\/li>\n<li>M\u00fcller, R.D., Sdrolias, M., Gaina, C. and Roest, W.R., 2008, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.earthbyte.org\/people\/dietmar\/Pdf\/Muller_etal_age_rate_asym_G3_2008.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Age spreading rates and spreading asymmetry of the world&#8217;s ocean crust<\/a> in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9, Q04006, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2007GC001743\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2007GC001743<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Pagani,M. , J. Garcia-Pelaez, R. Gee, K. Johnson, V. Poggi, R. Styron, G. Weatherill, M. Simionato, D. Vigan\u00f2, L. Danciu, D. Monelli (2018). Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Seismic Hazard Map (version 2018.1 &#8211; December 2018), DOI: 10.13117\/GEM-GLOBAL-SEISMIC-HAZARD-MAP-2018.1<\/li>\n<li>Silva, V ., D Amo-Oduro, A Calderon, J Dabbeek, V Despotaki, L Martins, A Rao, M Simionato, D Vigan\u00f2, C Yepes, A Acevedo, N Horspool, H Crowley, K Jaiswal, M Journeay, M Pittore, 2018. Global Earthquake Model (GEM) Seismic Risk Map (version 2018.1). <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13117\/GEM-GLOBAL-SEISMIC-RISK-MAP-2018.1\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13117\/GEM-GLOBAL-SEISMIC-RISK-MAP-2018.1<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Zhu, J., Baise, L. G., Thompson, E. M., 2017, An Updated Geospatial Liquefaction Model for Global Application, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107, p 1365-1385, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/0.1785\/0120160198\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/doi.org\/0.1785\/0120160198<\/a><\/li>\n<p><H3>Specific References<\/H3><\/p>\n<li>Bock et al., 2003. Crustal motion in Indonesia from Global Positioning System measurements in JGR, v.\/ 108, no. B8, 2367, doi:10.1029\/2001JB000324<\/li>\n<li>Hall, R., 2011. Australia\u2013SE Asia collision: plate tectonics and crustal flow in Hall, R., Cottam, M. A. &#038;Wilson, M. E. J. (eds) The SE Asian Gateway: History and Tectonics of the Australia\u2013Asia Collision. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 355, 75\u2013109.<\/li>\n<li>Fan, J-k., Wu, S-g., Spence, G., 2015. Tomographic evidence for a slab tear induced by fossil ridge subduction at Manila Trench, South China Sea in International Geology Review, v. 57, p. 998-1013, DOI: 10.1080\/00206814.2014.929054<\/li>\n<li>Hayes, G.P., Wald, D.J., and Johnson, R.L., 2012. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.agu.org\/pubs\/crossref\/2012\/2011JB008524.shtml\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Slab1.0: A three-dimensional model of global subduction zone geometries<\/a> in, J. Geophys. Res., 117, B01302, doi:10.1029\/2011JB008524<\/li>\n<li>Hsu, Y-J., Yu, S-B., Song, T-R.A., and Bacolcol, T., 2012. Plate coupling along the Manila subduction zone between Taiwan and northern Luzo in Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 51, p. 98-108<\/li>\n<li>McCaffrey, R., Silver, E.A., and Raitt, R.W., 1980. Crustal Structure of the Molucca Sea Collision Zone, Indonesia in The Tectonic and Geologic Evolution of Southeast Asian Seas and Islands-Geophysical Monograph 23, p. 161-177.<\/li>\n<li>Noda, A., 2013. Strike-Slip Basin \u2013 Its Configuration and Sedimentary Facies in <em>Mechanism of Sedimentary Basin Formation &#8211; Multidisciplinary Approach on Active Plate Margins<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.intechopen.com\/books\/mechanism-of-sedimentarybasin-formation-multidisciplinary-approach-on-active-plate-margins\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/www.intechopen.com\/books\/mechanism-of-sedimentarybasin-formation-multidisciplinary-approach-on-active-plate-margins<\/a> http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.5772\/56593<\/li>\n<li>Smoczyk, G.M., Hayes, G.P., Hamburger, M.W., Benz, H.M., Villase\u00f1or, Antonio, and Furlong, K.P., 2013. <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/earthquakes\/20170110_philippines\/smoczyk_etal_2013_seismicity_earth_philippine_sea_plate.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Seismicity of the Earth 1900\u20132012 Philippine Sea plate and vicinity: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010\u20131083-M<\/a>, 1 sheet, scale 1:10,000,000.<\/li>\n<li>Waltham et al., 2008. <a href=\"http:\/\/specialpapers.gsapubs.org\/content\/436\/11.abstract\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Basin formation by volcanic arc loading<\/a> in GSA Special Papers 2008, v. 436, p. 11-26.<\/li>\n<li>Wang, K., and Bilek, S.L., 2014. Invited review paper: Fault creep caused by subduction of rough seafloor relief in Tectonophysics, v. 610, p.\/ 1-24.<\/li>\n<li>Wu, J., J. Suppe, R. Lu, and R. Kanda, 2016. Philippine Sea and East Asian plate tectonics since 52 Ma constrained by new subducted slab reconstruction methods, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 121, doi:10.1002\/2016JB012923.<\/li>\n<li>Zahirovic et al., 2014. The Cretaceous and Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Southeast Asia in Solid Earth, v. 5, p. 227-273, doi:10.5194\/se-5-227-2014.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><H2><font color=\"orange\"><strong>Return to the <a href=\"http:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=3218\">Earthquake Reports page<\/a>.<\/font><\/strong><\/H2><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Sorted by <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=3219\">Magnitude<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Sorted by <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=3220\">Year<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Sorted by <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=9351\">Day of the Year<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Sorted By <a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?page_id=3226\">Region<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!-- time to complete: 6.25 hours -- 10:00 - 16:15--><\/p>\n<p><!--\n\u00b0\n\u2265\n\u00d1\n\u00f6\n\u00e1\n\u00b1\n\n\n\n\n<ul>\n\t\n\n<li><\/li>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<blockquote>\n\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<ul>\n\t\n\n<li><\/li>\n\n\n\n<a href=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\" width=\"100%\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a>\n\n\n\n\n<blockquote>\n\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry-summary\">\nThis morning (my time) I was awakened by the tsunami notification that I get on my phone. I lept into action. I get tsunami notifications so that I can respond to these potential tsunami events that may impact the coast&hellip;\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/?p=11611\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &ldquo;Earthquake Report: M 7.6 offshore of the Philippines&rdquo;<\/span>&hellip;<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":11612,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/20231202_philippines_interpretation-scaled.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11611"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11611"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11611\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11700,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11611\/revisions\/11700"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/11612"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earthjay.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}