<img src="http://b.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=6758056&cv=2.0&cj=1"/>
 

Little Pigeon Bay cottage smashed by tsunami waves

The cottage after the tsunami knocked it off its piles and washed away the deck and verandah.
SUPPLIED/AITKEN FAMILY

The cottage after the tsunami knocked it off its piles and washed away the deck and verandah.

A five-metre high tsunami has destroyed a historic holiday cottage on Banks Peninsula.

Owners Edward and Penny Aitken checked their 100-year-old building at daylight following Monday morning's earthquakes and tsunami warning. They were shocked to find it pushed off its piles and smashed.

"It's had it, it's a write-off," Edward Aitken said.

The cottage at Little Pigeon Bay, pictured before the tsunami.
SUPPLIED/AITKEN FAMILY

The cottage at Little Pigeon Bay, pictured before the tsunami.

The cottage sits at the head of north-facing Little Pigeon Bay. It is the only home in the inlet.

The Aitkens live at next door Pigeon Bay and rent out the cottage as holiday accommodation. It was vacant at the time.

READ MORE
Severe 7.5 quake in North Canterbury
North Canterbury's historic Waiau pub gutted

Inside the damaged cottage, where the water struck almost two metres high.
SUPPLIED/AITKEN FAMILY

Inside the damaged cottage, where the water struck almost two metres high.

Aitken said the waterline inside the house was nearly two metres high. They found logs and other debris on the property.

"The sheer huge force of the water demolished several of the walls and it's taken a deck and a verandah away.

"It's taken everything off its piles and demolished everything inside."

The force of the water picked up and tossed around furniture and appliances.
SUPPLIED/AITKEN FAMILY

The force of the water picked up and tossed around furniture and appliances.

The missing deck was discovered further around the bay and the garden furniture was on the beach or washed out to sea.

Ad Feedback

Aitken said the water was at low tide when the tsunami hit, meaning the wave must have been about five metres high.

"It's just surged up Little Pigeon Bay, and dumped on the house. The bay is narrow and that would've made it so much worse. 

"The alignment to Kaikoura [near the earthquake's epicentre] meant the surge would've just been funnelled up the bay."

Dr Emily Lane, a tsunami scientist at the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (Niwa), said the theory made sense.

"Depending on the shape, a bay can funnel the water if it opens to the direction the wave came from.

"You get water sloshing around in a bay and running up and down.

"If the first wave is rolling out when the second one comes in, it can set up a resonance and that's when you get the big waves."

A 2012 Niwa study found the north coast of Banks Peninsula, including Lyttelton Harbour, was at risk of higher tsunami waves than other nearby coasts. The word tsunami means harbour wave in Japanese.

Aitken said their wrecked cottage was solidly built and suffered only minor damage in previous earthquakes. Part of their family farm, it was once occupied by his parents.

He said the damage was "a bit upsetting" but they had lodged an insurance claim and would rebuild.

In the meantime, they would contact upcoming guests to advise them to make new holiday plans. The popular cottage was fully booked most weekends and over the summer holidays.

Nearby luxury lodge Annandale, on the other side of Pigeon Bay, moved guests out of waterfront accommodation on Monday morning as a precaution.

Hospitality director Callum Farnell said all their buildings stayed high and dry, although water came across the road. 

"It rolled in about 2am – we saw it coming up the harbour."

 - Stuff

 
 

Comments

13 days ago
Speedy
It's a 'renter' making good rental income, and it is insured.
13 days ago
Percival Sugden
Dear Mr Aitkin as one who has been through the recent earthquake debacle with EQC and Insurance companies I urge you to 1. seek legal advice from Grant Shand. 2. arrange with him without delay, expert reports on the damage to your property. 3. deliver to your insurers an ultimatum obliging them, without delay to honour the policy. 4. if it is not forthcoming sue them at the earliest opportunity. Thousands are still waiting from 6 years ago. My only regret was that I didn't sue earlier.

13 days ago
Nandee
An earth quake did not carry the huge heavy new deck that was there on the right hand side made from local timber and two metres wide and as long as the side of the house.    In a spring tide the water sometimes went under the house. Only one thing carried that solid heavy deck away and that was water!  
13 days ago
Art Vandelay
What a shame all the tsunami experts are on the stuff comment boards instead of working at the governments tsunami expert institute.
13 days ago
Martin C
I think you mean NIWA. No I don't work for them but I still can share knowledge.

13 days ago
knockeoj
Why do so many disbelieve this?  Its like only video evidence is sufficient nowadays.  Or, people think it has to be like the boxing day tsunami (which had waves up to 30m). The deck and verandah have clearly been ripped off and found further around the bay.  The quake was not felt strongly enough down here to do any of that damage.  Annandale saw the wave at 2am and the lyttleton tide charts confirm that.  For curioity it would have been nice to see more of the front lawn, but I believe the farmer knows what he is talking about.
13 days ago
Martin C
1to 1.5 metres of flowing water will move the deck. 5 metres is taller than standard street light post. I agree, not every event is like Boxing day. Check out the photos of the 1946 Gisborne tsunami for example. I would expect to see seaweed, sand and rocks and stones of different size on the lawn.

13 days ago
Hombre
This could become the scene of any beachside house anywhere in NZ now.  Same with homes of cliff edges.  Such is the nature of our changing environment [king tides, earthquakes, heavy rains] I sure wouldn't want to bed in any of these locations.  
13 days ago
Martin C
Tsunami? What tsunami.?   A tsunami scours the seabed and carries all sorts of debris in its body. The lawn should be scoured ad covered in seabed debris.   The house looks too untouched for a tsunami. 2m would be enough to cause major damage.  5m would be enough to carry the house up the valley or destroy it. All I see here is quake damage. 
13 days ago
Stevey23
There are black marks on the lower parts of the walls, stove and fridge.
13 days ago
Pete.James
Agree, 5m of water would have flatten it. Media trying to create a story. Liz McDonald, more evidence please
13 days ago
Peet
Depends on depth of wave. A 5 metre high wave with little depth (distance front to the back of the wave) wouldn't necessarily demolish a house. Whereas a 2 metre high wave with a 20 metre depth would totally destroy the place. 
13 days ago
Lapinreader
Martin C - so youve been there have you - then please explain how the quake tore the large deck off the right hand side of the house and relocated it in another part of the bay
13 days ago
Anonymuss
Not a good idea to own tsunami-front properties these days.
13 days ago
K Wez
I would of thought a 5m wave would of knocked the flowers off the table
13 days ago
Mrskef2
They may have trouble claiming with EQC as they only insure 'residential' properties and holiday homes aren't considered 'residential' so hopefully their private insurer will look after them!
13 days ago
Marky
Is that the one with the no access/private road/no turning sign on the last part of the (Council owned?) road from the hairpin?  
13 days ago
Nandee
Yes.
13 days ago
shona
Better to be safe that sorry or dead.  I would rather the warnings were given out an nothing happens than no warnings given out and 1000s are dead.  

Anyone living in NZ should know when a big eq hits, if in doubt go to higher ground.  
13 days ago
ep82
This is the most idyllic place you can imagine, you need to travel an hour to get to a dirt road where you have to travel 45 minutes through the farmers land to then drop down into a small sheltered bay. This was truly a place you could forget the world even existed for a week.
13 days ago
CHOWES77
...Move to the Mountains..... take what you can carry and leave the rest...!
13 days ago
Nandee
Oh I want to cry, we have stayed there so many times and wondered every time there were EQs how it fared.  It looks so sad.  Hopefully Edward has it insured well and it can be restored to it former glorious self.  Stunning place to stay, piece in container loads. 
13 days ago
Pat Hula
Makes you realise how inaccurate and wildly sensationalised all the tsunami panic is. For example, Wellington airport never closed yesterday morning, yet residents all up the harbour evacuated....but the airport is right by the coast, directly in the firing line of a "3-5 m wave".... Civil servants are guessing with this tsunami stuff. Ridiculous. 
13 days ago
TonySteves4
At least the authorities were accurate and that is the main thing. They got it correct and told Wellington they don't need to evacuate unless living on the foreshore basically. The airport is high therefore not in the red zone which is the zone that was warned. 
13 days ago
Mudshark
Sensationalised? So are you saying the tsunami didn't happen?
13 days ago
loose.unit8
Apparently photo evidence isn't enough for some
13 days ago
Pete.James
this photo is evidence of a earthquake not a tsunami.
13 days ago
Marshie
Your comments make me realise how daft some people are. I for one would rather they "get it wrong" than dont bother to warn me in the first place. Then there is the fact they didnt get it wrong. The airport was on standby for evacuation, it has well established evacuation plans, something lacking for most families, the buildings are all the height of the second or third floor of a house and built like the proverbial brick s#$t house and the airport authority doesnt need to deal with things like people being asleep in their beds at the time a potential tsunami turns into an actual tsunami. Think about it... 
13 days ago
AnythingButThat
Quite the opposite.  It made me appreciate how necessary the evacuation was.
13 days ago
Sean Redmond
Would you rather us have been hit with massive tsunamis like Japan,just because it didnt happen or they were not as big doesnt  mean it was sensationalised,perhaps they erred with the airport or maybe not,who knows,but the way i see it better to be safe than sorry.
13 days ago
hallway
and  Pat no doubt you would be the first to cry foul if they didnt warn anyone and just let you take what came.   
13 days ago
TaxT
I had no idea we has any tsunamis, if it were Japan we'd have  thousands of people living at that beach, as it happens a single building was lost.  Hardly even worth mentioning. 
13 days ago
Janice Milne
Really....well i can't wait for a natural disaster to happen in your little part of paradise.
13 days ago
AnythingButThat
This was not a large tsunami.  Comparing it to Japan's event is naive at best.
13 days ago
IanInNZ
Aitken is wrong. The tsunami happened when it was high tide, that is why there was an alert and evacuation from low lying areas, if it had been low tide, the tsunami would have made it not much more than high tide and there wouldn't have been any concern. High tide was 4.24am at sumner, so a little earlier in pigeon bay, it is when all the sirens were going and alerts issued. The tide was 2.5m above low tide, if he has marks around 5m in his house, then the tsunami was around 2m, maybe as much as 2.5m (it is pretty exposed to the open sea there). But is certainly wasn't 5m.
13 days ago
Mudshark
He said that marks were around 2 metres high in the house, maybe you are the one wrong.
13 days ago
IanInNZ
Yes, he did say his marks were 2m in the house - which is 5m above the water line. 2.5m high tide + tsunami of 2.5m = 5m. Maybe math isn't your strong point. Believe me, if we had a 5m tsunami at high tide in Chch there would have been a lot of damage. A surge up the estuary and Avon and Heathcoate rivers would have taken out Southshore, Sumner, Red Cliffs, and a good lump of the east half of the city. Not to mention, the beach settlements (Leithfield beach, Amberly beach etc), or Port of Lyttelton, Governors Bay and other bays in the area with sea side dwellings. We did not have a 5m tsunami, we evacuated our house that night, I know it was high tide, and if we had a 5m tsunami, we wouldn't have had a house to go back to.
13 days ago
John Day
It not so much the hight of the wave but the energy in the wave. A wind generated wave that you see at the beach will be only twice it hight long but a tsunami can easily be 30 kilometre long and the energy in a 2 metre wave will take it far beyond the high tide mark, All that 30ks will try and get ashore. When you hear the alarm just move an hour out of bed is better then eternity in a box 
13 days ago
[removed]
This comment has been deleted
13 days ago
Jimmystu
You're 100's of kilometers away from the epicentre. What did you expect? Just because the quake didn't happen in your backyard, doesn't mean the quake didn't happen. 
13 days ago
KiwiClare
We're in Taranaki and felt it well and truly....you must be a heavy sleeper!
13 days ago
RVREVO
felt it in Auckland. that was a slight sway. however, a friend on Waiheke Island didn't feel a thing. perhaps balcutha is a disconnected part of the countryside, which is not as uncommon as you might think
13 days ago
no1heather
Well I can assure you for the people in the heart of these natural disasters I can assure you that these are traumatic, dramatic and life changing events and the media plays a vital role in keeping those involved informed ... you know just the little things like where to get water, ablutions, where to get help and when they will get help. If the Clyde Dam ever breaches maybe you might feel that and maybe the media might remember that that they don't like a song and dance made of things or anything sensationalised in little old Balclutha.
13 days ago
poocs
Exactly.  Many many kilometers away I was totally freaked out by it - heaven only knows what it was like closer.  Having calm and competent Radio NZ announcers telling me (and everyone else) what was going on was incredibly reassuring.  
13 days ago
Searching
Nice trolling, but then again our nana never felt it either. You old people can sleep through anything! Too many Nana naps for you Smithy lol
13 days ago
Di Trower
I'm happy for you, Nana Smith - count your blessings.
13 days ago
MMTT
Oh next time my 10 yr old gets woken up to glasses and plates smashing in the kitchen, clocks fall off thew wall, his bedside lamp falls off and hits him and his fish tank spilling all over his book shelf, as the house shakes and rattles and then we need to evacuate to the hills and then bunk down at a friends house for the rest of the night, I'll just remember to tell him "Its just the media sensationalism, go back to sleep" 
13 days ago
Flow In
be glad. it was a huge quake. Feeling it reach Hokitika was bad enough.
13 days ago
SteveCarter
move to kaikoura and then tell us it's sensationalized.
13 days ago
poocs
Two people dead, $billions in damage, and you think its sensationalised?  Just how big does an event have to be before you consider it worth reporting?  Just because you "barely felt a thing" in your insular little community doesn't mean its not news.  And I certainly felt it and was scared by it, and I was a long way from the epicentre - I'm surprised you didn't feel it
13 days ago
GeeKay
Strange how quakes and fault-lines work. We live in Northland (where there are NO quakes... apparently) BUT My teenage daughter was woken up with her bed shaking and ornaments 'tinkling' in her room at 00:03 Monday morning. 45mins later her Aunt rang from Blenheim to say they had evacuated due to this massive 7.5mag quake which had rocked them out of bed. Our local Waipu Caves seismograph had registered the quake quite spectacularly here in Northland. The tsunami sirens went off here in our seaside community to alert low lying occupants to evacuate (in saying that, most locals slept through the sirens, blissfully unaware).
13 days ago
glenncumming
Such a beautiful picture; a historical house in a background of NZ at its best. Unfortunately, so much of NZ's best was caused by its sitting on the Pacific Rim of Fire. The Fiords, the Straight, the Thermal Highway. God's Own Country sometimes reminds us, and harshly so, that natural majesty is terrible as well as wonderful. We are privileged to live on a land that reminds us of the power, terror, and beauty of our world.
13 days ago
Bleu
I love this little place. So many special holidays here. I am so sorry for the lovely owners and for all of those who have lost another special place. I hope a rebuild can happen. Thinking of everyone who suffered more loss in the latest round of quakes.
13 days ago
thecatspyjamas
Don't forget, it happened at low tide. That photo looks nearer high tide mark. 
13 days ago
IanInNZ
Actually, it was high tide when the tsunami was happening - around 4.20am was high tide.
13 days ago
GeeKay
What if the tsunami did a classic little tsunami trick... suck out the (nearly) full tide... then surge it all back in with immense force? Yikes amageddon outta there!!
14 days ago
Tekniks
If it was low tide when the tsunami struck then a 5 metre wave is quite believable, looks about 4 metres to the lawn.
14 days ago
Bigbossmannz
Have sat on that deck out front a few times and knocked back some cold ones. Such a nice spot on a beautiful farm. Sad to see it in its current state.
13 days ago
Nandee
Same, many, many times, the place heals the soul.  I so hope it can be restored and maybe raised.  
14 days ago
tanenui
5m tsunami? More like 0.5m. Look at the marks on the walls and whiteware. A 5 m tsunami would swallow the whole house and leave nothing except debris. Windows and glass doors are okay as well. Still very sad for the owners though.
13 days ago
FullMoon
5m above normal sea level. So if the house is normally 4.5m above sea level at low tide, it would take a 5m wave to reach 0.5m up the walls.
13 days ago
nationer

it was low tide at the time as per above.

13 days ago
Domorobo
5m above low tide. Not 5m at the house
13 days ago
EnterExit
The house isn't at sea level, it looks 4/5 meters above sea level.

A 0.5 meter wave wouldn't make it that high. Maybe a 5 meter wave would tho. Hmmm
13 days ago
MrSafetyCatch
Read the article properly next time.
 
"Aitken said the water was at low tide when the tsunami hit, meaning the wave must have been about five metres high"

Not a 5m wave high when it hit the house, but would of had to be 5m to reach the house up the beach and over the lawn.
14 days ago
MildGreens
It would help if folk understood the bath effect and volumetric mass/inertia  in in a constrained vessel.  -  The science would predict it was probably 'very lucky' no one was there.... they would have been in all likely hood sucked out to sea if they didn't go to high ground immediately.  What was left there, stayed because it couldn't get out of the doorway!

The fridge wouldn't be on the veranda saying "what the hell is that coming down the bay..."

To see such damage, look at the damage created by just a significant rockfall in a fjord. The intensity and power that accumulates at node points (amplitude is additive, or subtractive, but power is RMS) is not unlike in Christchurch's case, like pebbles in a pond, but in a fixed vessel, like a narrow harbour, then the effect compounds - energy is preserved, in a rapidly ever decreasing volume. Think the opposite of the inverse square rule for the power of the wind for example.
14 days ago
Jan Workman
Clearly all you "Doubting Thomas's" have never walked in the same shoes as those who have suffered. Give them a break and show a little compassion.
14 days ago
Mothergoose

"It rolled in at 2am'

And the tsunami siren sounded in the Sumner Redcliffs region AFTER that!!! 

14 days ago
Brett Hayvice
Yes, I saw a low tide at Raumati turn into a very high tide within a few minutes and back out to sea to low tide after 10 minutes, all at least 30 mins b4 warning issued. My point being that the tsunami had already hit b4 warning. If a big one hits don't wait for the warning. If it had been high tide to start with people would have been in danger.
13 days ago
AnythingButThat
Yes, I'm surprised there hasn't been a media probe into that.  The Police were going door to door along the shore in Christchurch telling people they needed to evacuate long before the sirens went off.  They should have gone off as soon as National Civil Defence issued the alert.
13 days ago
Tool1
I got out as soon as I saw the alert on the civil defense website. We weren't waiting for the alarms to go off.  As they say, any eq that goes on for a long period and is hard to stand up in you need to seek higher ground. When we left the traffic was light and made it  easy to get away. Friends how left later when the sirens finally went off told me of long queues of cars and people going the wrong way on roundabouts to get out.
14 days ago
WorldPolice
I think a 50cm wave hitting would splash a bit
14 days ago
SDG
Fixable. Looking at those pics. Jack it up reset it.
14 days ago
Damian Curtis
"pushed off its piles and smashed"
Zooming in on photo shows not the case.
Stuff reporter a little dramatic
14 days ago
Speeder Mandos
Check again. That was a direct quote from the home owner, not from the reporter.
14 days ago
Alleb
a lot was thrown around yet somehow the vase of flowers stayed perfectly in the middle of an upright dining table with chairs still in place...
14 days ago
MummaDutk
That's the first thing I noticed too!! Th upright vase of flowers on the table
14 days ago
matlar007
If a camera had been rolling you would probably see the vase sliding around all over the table but never quite falling off.
It has a lower centre of gravity than the bigger items so didn't fall over.
OR the house owners might have absentmindedly up righted it before taking their photos.
13 days ago
Nandee
Funny in the Feb quake we lost everything, house and contents but in a photo the insurance company took the only thing unbroken was a vase on the table and what was in it sitting exactly where it had been.  
14 days ago
OldDog
5 metres or 3 metres or whatever. No one was there to measure it and the place was trashed. That's the story.
14 days ago
denni
the vase of flowers is still sitting on the table
14 days ago
janjam
Yes and a brass ornament is still on the mantelpiece. What's your point - are you suggesting that the whole thing is staged ?
14 days ago
Petals356
Exactly!!
13 days ago
poocs
Ever heard of blutack?
14 days ago
janjam
It's a tiny bay - a 5 metre surge coming in there sounds entirely plausible to me.
14 days ago
Lizzy Moyle
Such a perfect spot. gutted :(
14 days ago
HamishNP
Very sad, although I imagine much of it would be salvageable, and could be rebuilt - perhaps a little further up the gully! 
14 days ago
NZnewssucks
5m of water in a tsunami surge would have flattened that property completely. Sensational journalism yet again.
13 days ago
nationer

5 metre from low tide mark.

If it had been high tide it would have been a different story

14 days ago
Deb Woodhouse
Sorry to read that Penny & Edward. Thinking of you at this tough time xx
14 days ago
TedR
Five metres? Seems unlikely it would still be standing in any recognisable form.
14 days ago
janjam
5 metres from sea level.
14 days ago
manuka
5 meters at low tide, I would assume they didn't build the house on the low tide mark.
13 days ago
Nandee
No but it is close.  Spring tides went under the house, once washed up a dolphin.  
14 days ago
Lapinreader
Such a shame, stayed there on 3 occassions - a very cool place
14 days ago
Steve Tellurian
"nah that looks like historic damage to me"  .... #EQC
14 days ago
[removed]
This comment has been deleted
14 days ago
Cranbery06
He tried that many times in Christchurch.
14 days ago
NoWayJose
I'm  sure EQC will look at the place in a few years and claim it can be rebuilt. I feel for the next round of "casualties".
13 days ago
Tag96
But hopefully we will have eliminated the cowboy inspectors and cowboy builders by then so that whatever the outcome it's right the first time.
13 days ago
Heiney hole
Really
13 days ago
MelTheGirl
Instead of berating why don't you who is obviously all knowing take over the running of EQC!
13 days ago
Mrskef2
They may have trouble with EQC as they only insure 'residential' properties and holiday homes aren't considered 'residential' so hopefully their private insurer will look after them!
14 days ago
MrGiggles
five metre surge may be more specific..
13 days ago
Al Bino
Tsunami translation is harbour wave. Seems pretty accurate/ specific enough actually??
13 days ago
MrGiggles
You lost me after your literal translation and not even referring to five metres high.... Of course it translates as harbour wave   but that is not the context of the word....  
14 days ago
MirandaJSmith
Could you ask an 'expert' if the five metre claim can be verified?
14 days ago
Al.
so, how else can you explain the internal water level?
13 days ago
nationer
yes you can see on the stove and fridge
13 days ago
bart.h
Because the bay narrows the water level rises as it moves it forward. It may well have been .5m at the heads and 5m (from low tide mark) once it got to the house.
13 days ago
Graedad
"Dr Emily Lane, a tsunami scientist at the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (Niwa), said the theory made sense.........." Quoted in the article!!! Read the whole article and understand before you comment....
13 days ago
CeilingCat
Or you could have a look at Little Pigeon bay on a map. It is funnel shaped with the house at the apex. You know that the water from a tsunami has to go somewhere right? If it's constrained in a funnel, what do you think will happen to the height of the wave as it progresses up the bay?
14 days ago
Standing Joke
High tide at 4am, so their 5m height calculations may be a bit off.
Ad Feedback
special offers